Employer Benefits Obligations: Read Documents Carefully
Employer Benefits Obligations: Read Documents Carefully
A recent Ontario labour arbitration decision confirms the importance of having employment and benefits documents drafted with care.
In Ontario Nurses’ Association v Victorian Order of Nurses for Canada – Ontario Branch, 2017 CanLII 5514 (ON LA), the arbitrator found that a claim against the employer for denial of long-term disability (LTD) benefits was inarbitrable.
Background
Deborah Hatt was engaged by the VON to perform home care at patients’ homes. Unfortunately, she has a serious medical condition which resulted in her being unable to work.
The obligations of the employer relating to LTD benefits as they relate to Hatt are set out in a collective agreement negotiated with the ONA. The key provision in the collective agreement provides as follows:
The Employer shall contribute towards the premium coverage of participating eligible nurses in the active employ of the Employer under the insurance plans set out below, subject to their respective terms and conditions, including any enrolment requirements.
When Hatt was denied LTD benefits, she filed a grievance pursuant to the collective agreement.
Positions of the Parties
The VON’s position before the labour arbitrator was its obligations were limited to obtaining an LTD plan and remitting premiums on behalf of employees. In other words, the collective agreement and employer obligations were “premiums only”, with no commitment that specific benefits would be provided. Simply put, the VON emphasized that terms and conditions of coverage were a matter between the insurance carrier and the employees.
The union’s position was that the language incorporated the insurance benefits, including LTD coverage, into the collective agreement. In particular, there was reference to a plan being established, which arguably created an employer obligation.
Outcome
The arbitrator accepted the employer’s argument based on the specific wording of the collective agreement. The collective agreement was drafted such that any and all responsibility for payment of benefits was with the insurance carrier. As a result, there was no jurisdiction in this particular case for a labour arbitrator to hear a case about the denial of LTD benefits.
Takeaways for Employers
This decision highlights the importance of careful review and drafting. While the ruling comes from a labour arbitrator, these principles are also applicable to non-union employees who may have similar wording in their offer letters and employment contracts. In all cases, explicit limits to employer obligations can save costs and needless disputes.
by George Waggott
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)View More
First pilot project in Quebec aimed at granting an advantage to enterprises hiring indigenous peoples for the performance of a public contract
First pilot project in Quebec aimed at granting an advantage to enterprises hiring Indigenous peoples to perform a public contract.
Introducing Bill 185, the Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, and an Update on the New Provincial Planning Statement
On April 10, 2024, Ontario’s provincial government introduced new legislation in its quest to “cut red tape”, speed up government processes, and meet its goal.
Consumer-Driven Banking is (almost) Here! Highlights from Budget 2024
On April 16, the Government of Canada released its 2024 budget which includes the promise of new legislation this spring to implement open banking in Canada.
Ontario Employers Beware: Common Termination Language Held Unenforceable
Ontario's Superior Court of Justice found that a termination clause was unenforceable because it gave the employer discretion to terminate "at any time".
Warning For Businesses: Companies Can be Liable for Tort of Bribery Even if They Did Not Intend to Pay or Receive a Bribe
Businesses with a duty to provide impartial advice must take steps to ensure the payments they make or receive are not later interpreted as bribes.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.