Reminder: BC Franchise Legislation in Effect February 1st, 2017
As of February 1, 2017, any company offering franchises in British Columbia must be in compliance with the province’s new franchise disclosure requirements, or risk serious consequences. As set out in our previous bulletins from November 2015 and October 2016, British Columbia’s new Franchises Act (the “Franchises Act”) and accompanying Regulations come into force on that date, bringing not only a detailed set of disclosure requirements for franchisors, but also a host of remedies for franchisees to use when dealing with non-compliant franchisors.
Failure of a franchisor to provide adequate disclosure pursuant to the Franchises Act will permit franchisees to rescind their franchise agreements for up to two years. Successful rescission claims may be extremely costly to franchisors, who may be on the hook for any losses of the franchisee during that time, including long term lease obligations. As such, we strongly recommend that franchisors consult their legal counsel now to ensure their disclosure documents are compliant with the Franchises Act, and making any necessary changes to their existing disclosure documents.
Franchisors currently operating in B.C. but not elsewhere in Canada, or franchisors who have not otherwise previously provided disclosure, will need to develop compliant disclosure documents in order to meet their obligations under the Franchises Act and avoid the risk of contravention.
Franchisors who are already providing compliant disclosure in provinces which have specific franchise legislation (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island) will likely be substantially compliant with the Franchises Act. However, we recommend reviewing the applicable disclosure obligations under the Franchises Act carefully in order to avoid inadvertent contravention that may result from a failure to make necessary adjustments.
by Michael E. Reid and Dharampreet Dhillon, Articled Student
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)View More
More Than Meets the Eye: The Legal Implications of British Columbia’s Agreement to Recognize Aboriginal Title Over Haida Gwaii
An analysis of legal implications related to the BC Government's agreement with the Haida Nation to recognize Aboriginal title over Haida Gwaii.
Lessons Learned from the TTC’s Ransomware Attack
Lessons learned from the recent investigation by the Ontario IPC into the effectiveness of the TTC's cybersecurity measures and ransomware attack response
Don’t Get Caught by Canada’s Patent Novelty Grace-Period
The key difference between Canada and other jurisdictions like the United States when relying on the grace-period for inventor disclosures.
Shifting Gears – Canada to Consider New Motor Vehicle Equipment Regulations to Help Prevent Auto Theft
Transport Canada announces plan to update safety standards to combat auto theft.
Budget 2024: Legislative Changes of Note for Investment Funds
In Budget 2024, the Government acknowledges that the restrictions placed on the property that may be held by registered plans have become unduly complex.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.