Alberta Court of Appeal Dismisses Property Tax Appeal: Municipalities are Not Secured Creditors for Taxes Assessed on Pipelines, Wells and Other Linear Property
Alberta Court of Appeal Dismisses Property Tax Appeal: Municipalities are Not Secured Creditors for Taxes Assessed on Pipelines, Wells and Other Linear Property
The Alberta Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal brought by three municipalities (the “Municipalities”) seeking status as secured creditors entitled to special priority for payment of linear property taxes.
In Northern Sunrise County v Virginia Hills Oil Corp, 2019 ABCA 61, the primary issue was whether the Municipal Government Act (“MGA”) grants to an Alberta municipality a special lien for linear property taxes, which lien ranks senior in priority to contractual security interests if the tax debtor is not bankrupt or subject to other insolvency proceedings.
Background
In 2017, Virginia Hills and Dolomite Energy, two oil and gas companies with wells, pipelines and related equipment, were placed into receivership and later became bankrupt. The debtors’ secured creditors (the “Secured Creditors”) were owed more than the realized value of the debtors’ assets. The receiver applied for advice and direction regarding whether the linear property tax claims were secured or unsecured.
The Municipalities did not make submissions before the chambers justice and a final distribution order was granted in favour of the Secured Creditors. The Municipalities appealed the order arguing that linear property tax claims were secured claims due to the special lien afforded to Municipalities under section 348 of the MGA and were payable in priority to other secured creditors.
Decision
Section 348 of the MGA is an ambiguous provision that does not specify whether the municipal property taxes secured by the special lien include linear or non-linear taxes or both. As a result, the Court undertook an exercise in statutory interpretation of section 348.
In dismissing the Municipalities’ appeal, the Court ruled that section 348 does not include linear property. The Court made this decision after considering the taxation scheme of the MGA as a whole, including the remedies available to municipalities to collect taxes under the MGA.
The Court agreed with the receiver that difficulties would arise in applying a special lien to linear property due to uncertainty about the property to which the special lien would attach.
Implications
This decision is of considerable importance to participants in the Alberta oil and gas industry, including receivers, trustees, municipalities and secured lenders. Administration of a number of cases had been delayed (in some cases for long periods of time) pending the release of this decision. All stakeholders will benefit from the clear finding that claims for linear property tax arrears are unsecured.
McMillan successfully represented The Bank of Nova Scotia, as agent for the senior lenders to Virginia Hills Oil Corp. which was a respondent in this appeal.
by Richard Jones, Adam Maerov and Preet Saini
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2019
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Update for Federal Employers: What’s in Store For 2024
Federal employers should be preparing for key dates upcoming in 2024, including updates to the Canada Labour Code and a key deadline under the Pay Equity Act.
Transformative Change: Your Guide to Canada’s Breathtaking Competition Act Changes
We provide a summary of far-reaching Competition Act amendments proposed in 2023.
Class Actions May Now Be Easier to Defeat in Ontario
It is now clear: the revised preferability analysis under the amended Class Proceedings Act is a strict, more onerous hurdle for plaintiffs to satisfy.
R. vs Greater Sudbury Webinar
Following a brief overview of the case and the SCC’s split decision, this discussion will focus on the implications of the decision to the roles and responsibilities of each project party, including the owner, contractor and design consultant (architect and engineer). The discussion will be interactive and will include an extensive Q&A period.
Client Alert – Certain Canadian Corporations May Be Subject to US Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Requirements
Certain Canadian Corporations Conducting Business in the United States May Be Subject to US Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Requirements
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.