Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

An Update on CSA Policy Initiatives to Reduce Regulatory Burden for Reporting Issuers

April 2018 Capital Markets Bulletin 3 minutes read

On March 27, 2018, the Canadian Securities Administrators (the “CSA”) published CSA Staff Notice 51-353 Update on CSA Consultation Paper 51-404 Considerations for Reducing Regulatory Burden for Non-Investment Fund Reporting Issuers (the “Notice”). The Notice outlines the CSA’s plan to pursue several policy projects which could reduce regulatory burden for public companies in Canada.

Background on the Consultation Paper

The CSA’s announcement of the policy projects follows comments received by the CSA in response to CSA Consultation Paper 51-404 – Considerations for Reducing Regulatory Burden for Non-Investment Fund Reporting Issuers (the “Consultation Paper”). For further information regarding the Consultation Paper, please see our April 2017 bulletin, Reducing Regulatory Burdens for Reporting Issuers.

Policy Initiatives

The Notice announces the CSA’s intention to pursue the following six policy initiatives:

1.  An alternative prospectus model

The CSA will consider the merits of an alternative prospectus offering model which would include more concise and focused disclosure than the current regime. As the majority of trading occurs on the secondary market, the CSA notes that an alternative prospectus model may put more focus on a reporting issuer’s continuous disclosure while de-emphasizing the traditional focus on primary market disclosure.

2.  Facilitating at-the-market offerings

The CSA intends to review options to facilitate at-the-market (“ATM”) offerings in Canada. Currently, reporting issuers wishing to conduct an ATM offering must obtain exemptive relief from certain securities legislation requirements. The CSA’s policy project will include a review of whether codifying certain elements of the exemptive relief would be appropriate, as well as options to relax (or possibly eliminate) certain other restrictions on ATM offerings.

3.  Revisiting the primary business requirements

As a result of certain comments received on the Consultation Paper, the CSA intends to revisit the historical financial statement requirements in an IPO prospectus which are listed in Item 32 of Form 41-101F1 Information Required in a Prospectus. The CSA received several comments which indicated inconsistencies between staff interpretation of these requirements across jurisdictions in Canada. Accordingly, the CSA plans to review and provide greater clarity to issuers regarding these requirements.

4.  Removing or modifying the criteria to file a business acquisition report

Commenters provided a wide range of suggestions on how the CSA can reduce regulatory burden for reporting issuers regarding the requirement to file a business acquisition report (“BAR“). Reporting issuers are currently required to file a BAR within 75 days after completion of an acquisition that meets the significance tests set out in Part 8 of National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations. However, preparation of a BAR can involve significant time and costs on the part of the issuer and the information required is often difficult to obtain. Reporting issuers are frequently granted certain relief from the BAR requirements. The CSA plans to initiate a policy project to review various ways in which the regulatory burden regarding BAR requirements can be reduced.

5.  Revisiting certain continuous disclosure requirements

The CSA also announced a policy project to review certain continuous disclosure requirements for options to reduce regulatory burden associated with continuous disclosure, including but not limited to the following:

  1. eliminating duplicative disclosure among the financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A“), and other continuous disclosure forms;
  2. consolidating two or more of the financial statements, MD&A and annual information form (“AIF“) into one reporting document; and
  3. examining whether the volume of information in annual and interim filings can be reduced in order to prevent excessive disclosure from obscuring key information or otherwise enhance the quality and accessibility of disclose.

6.  Enhancing electronic delivery of documents

Under the current “notice-and-access” method of document delivery, reporting issuers must deliver printed notice and voting documents to beneficial owners who have not given their prior consent to delivery. In response to several comments regarding the significant costs which may be incurred by reporting issuers in order to comply with printing and delivery requirements, the CSA will review options which could facilitate further electronic delivery of documents, including the suggestion by commenters of switching the current default to electronic delivery, provided that investors retain an option to receive paper documents.

Next Steps

The CSA intends to initiate the six policy projects in the near future and will establish working groups to identify the scope and timelines of each initiative. Any potential changes to securities legislation will be published for comment.

by Jason Haley

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2018

Related Publications (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Real Estate Litigation: Summer Highlights

Even in the summer months, the legal news does not let up. Here are some recent decisions and legislative developments as we head into the 2021 fall season.

Read More
Sep 21, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s Employment and Labour Webinar

Join McMillan's annual Employment and Labour Seminar on Tuesday, October 5th as we address significant legal developments and provide practical advice on responding to employee issues.

Details
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Featured Insight

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms: CCAA Super-Priority Charges Rank Ahead of CRA’s Deemed Trusts

Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. provided much needed clarity regarding the order of priority for unremitted source deductions in restructuring proceedings.

Read More
Sep 17, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s ESG Strategy Sessions

The COVID-19 pandemic and increased concerns over environmental and social issues, such as climate change and systemic racism, have prompted conversations throughout global capital markets.

Details
Wednesday, October 6, 2021
Featured Insight

Divisional Court confirms Environmental Significance of Ministerial Zoning Orders and Importance of Consultation under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993

Review of Divisional Court decision: Ontario’s compliance with Environmental Bill of Rights in passing Bill 197, particularly re: Ministerial Zoning Orders

Read More
Sep 13, 2021