Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Budget 2016: GST / HST Changes Affecting Charities

March 2016 Tax Bulletin 2 minute read

Charities rely on various fundraising activities to generate revenue. Such fundraising activities may include providing property or services to induce donations. Under the existing rules in the Excise Tax Act (the “ETA“), the supply by a GST/HST registrant charity of non-exempt goods or services in exchange for a donation imposes obligations on the charity to charge, collect and remit GST/HST on the full value of the donation, even if this value exceeds the value of the property or services.

Although there are a number of exemptions to the obligation of charities to charge and collect GST/HST that apply under various circumstances, such as in respect of an admission to a fund-raising dinner, or for the provision of previously donated property, this rule nevertheless often gives rise to onerous GST/HST collection and remittance obligations, which undermine the ability of charities to raise funds.

In contrast to the treatment of charities under the ETA, the “split-receipting” rules under the Income Tax Act (the “ITA“) allow a charity to issue a donation receipt for the amount paid by the donor less the value of any property or service that the donor receives. Thus, such donations are treated less favorably under the ETA than under the ITA by requiring GST/HST to be charged and collected on the full value of the donation made by the donor, rather than solely in respect of the value of the property or services received in return by the donor. Budget 2016 contains proposals to bring the GST/HST treatment of such donations in line with the treatment of such an exchange under the ITA.

To accomplish this objective, Budget 2016 amends the ETA to deem the value of the consideration for the taxable supply of property or services by a charity to be equal to the fair market value of the property or services at the time the supply is made. Overall, the amendment will ensure that the portion of the donation that exceeds the value of the property or services received in return is relieved from GST/HST.

This change will apply to taxable supplies of goods and services made by charities after March 22, 2016 (“Budget Day“).

Transitional Relief

Where, between December 21, 2002 (when the income tax split-receipting rules came into effect) and Budget Day, a registrant charity did not collect GST/HST on the full value of donations made in exchange for the taxable supply of property or services, the proposals contained in Budget 2016 provide transitional relief. If, during this period, GST/HST was charged on the value of an inducement (i.e., the value of the property or services received in return by a donor to induce his or her donation), or the value of the inducement was less than $500, the donors’ and charities’ GST/HST obligations will be deemed to have been satisfied. In other cases where a charity was non-compliant with the then existing law (e.g., the charity did not charge, collect or remit any GST/HST), the charity will be required to remit GST/HST on the value of the inducement only. The upshot of this transitional relief is that the new changes to the ETA applies retroactively to an inducement of $500 or more. Where an inducement was less than $500, any non-compliance is effectively ignored by deeming the consideration received for the inducement to be nil.

by Jamie Wilks and Ehsan Wahidie, Student-at-Law

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2016

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Trademark of Foreign Owner Invalidated on the Basis of Bad Faith

Awareness of a senior rights holder’s trademark and its prior use of such trademark in Canada is relevant to the assessment of bad faith.

Read More
Mar 22, 2023
Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Details
Wednesday, April 19, 2023