


Budget 2021: CRA to be Granted the Authority to Compel Oral Responses
Budget 2021: CRA to be Granted the Authority to Compel Oral Responses
Budget 2021 proposes to grant the Canada Revenue Agency (the “CRA”) the authority to demand oral responses in the course of an audit. The proposed measure will apply to audits undertaken under a number of statutes, including the Income Tax Act (the “Tax Act”), the Excise Tax Act, the Excise Act, 2001, the Air Travellers Security Charge Act and Part 1 of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, and is being introduced in response to the judgment rendered by the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada (National Revenue) v. Cameco Corporation[1].
Under the Tax Act, the CRA has the authority to audit taxpayers and otherwise ensure compliance with the statute. Paragraphs 231.1(1)(c) and (d) of the Tax Act currently provide that a CRA official may, at any reasonable time, for any purpose related to the administration or enforcement of the Tax Act:
- enter any premises where a business is carried on, any property is kept, anything is done in connection with a business or any books or records are or should be kept, and
- require the owner or manager of the property or business and any other person at the premises to give the CRA official all reasonable assistance and answer all proper questions relating to the administration or enforcement of the Tax Act and, for this purpose, require the owner or manager to attend at the premises with the CRA official.
Budget 2021 proposes statutory amendments that will expand the audit authority of CRA officials and will specifically authorize a CRA official to require the owner, manager or any other person on the premises of a taxpayer to answer all proper questions orally or in writing, in any form specified by the CRA auditor.
The proposed amendments will place greater responsibility on taxpayers to provide information to CRA auditors in the form requested by the auditor. Nevertheless, taxpayers should continue to adhere to certain best practices, including the following:
- Taxpayers should generally only answer the questions that are posed by the CRA auditor.
- If a question from an auditor is unclear, the taxpayer should ask for clarification.
- Taxpayers should not speculate or guess. Taxpayers should only provide information that they are confident is complete and accurate.
The proposed amendments to the audit authority of the CRA will take effect upon their enactment.
[1] Canada (National Revenue) v. Cameco Corporation, 2019 FCA 67 available online here.
by Michael Friedman and Zachary Janes (Articling Student)
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2021
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Automotive Webinar Series | Part III: Where Rubber Meets the Road: Automotive Litigation Update
At this session, our panel of experts will provide a panoramic view of the evolution of automotive class actions across Canada, a review of best practices for managing disputes with distributors and franchisees, and
insights into litigation and disclosure obligations arising from automotive industry labour issues.
Automotive Webinar Series | Part II: Looking towards the Future: Automotive Legislation Updates
Our panel of professionals will highlight important changes impacting the automotive industry in Canada’s ever-evolving regulatory landscape including updates to cross-border sales legislation, advertising obligations arising from drip pricing provisions under the Competition Act and understanding Transport Canada's lates enforcement tool: administrative monetary penalties.
Nothing Casual about it: Hotel Faces Employees’ Class Action over Employment Benefit Changes
Hotel faces employees' class action over employment benefit changes.
“Mend your speech a little, lest it may mar your fortunes”: Are Employee Defamation Cases A Fool’s Errand?
This bulletin discusses the recent decision in Williams v. Vac Developments Limited regarding gag defamation proceedings commenced by employers.
Overholding in Commercial Leasing
The concept of overholding is often misunderstood and deserves more attention in commercial leases, given the significant consequences for landlords and tenants.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.