


Budget 2024: Synthetic Equity Arrangement Restrictions Tightened
Budget 2024: Synthetic Equity Arrangement Restrictions Tightened
The Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Tax Act”) generally permits a corporation to deduct the amount of a dividend received from another corporation resident in Canada when computing its taxable income, subject to certain limitations (a “Dividend Received Deduction”).
Among the applicable limitations, the Tax Act contains certain specific anti-avoidance rules that preclude a corporation from claiming a Dividend Received Deduction where the dividend arises as part of a “synthetic equity arrangement”. Synthetic equity arrangements include arrangements that involve share transactions where all or substantially all of the risk of loss or opportunity for gain or profit in respect of the shares are retained by the transferor (the Canada Revenue Agency typically interprets the phrase “all or substantially all” to represent 90% or more of a particular amount.). Under a classical synthetic equity arrangement in respect of a share, a taxable Canadian corporation enters into a forward share sale agreement with a tax-exempt counterparty and agrees to compensate the counterparty for the amount of any dividends received on the share prior to the ultimate sale. The corporate taxpayer seeks to claim tax deductions in respect of the dividend compensation payments made to the counterparty in addition to the Dividend Received Deduction in respect of any dividends received on the share. Absent the “synthetic equity arrangement” anti-avoidance rule, the corporate taxpayer would effectively be entitled to claim two deductions in respect of the same dividend.
The Tax Act currently provides certain exceptions to the application of the “synthetic equity arrangement” anti-avoidance rule, including where the taxpayer can establish that no “tax-indifferent investor” bore all or substantially all of the economic exposure in respect of the share upon which the subject dividend is paid. (A “tax indifferent investor” includes persons that are exempt from taxation under the Tax Act.) A related exception also applies to synthetic equity arrangements traded on a derivatives exchange.
Budget 2024 proposes to tighten the “synthetic equity arrangement” anti-avoidance rule by eliminating the no “tax-indifferent investor” exception (including the exchange traded exception). The Government asserts that such amendments will simplify the anti-avoidance rule and ostensibly prevent taxpayers from claiming the Dividend Received Deduction in unwarranted circumstances.
It is curious that the Government has concluded that the motivations for originally enacting the exceptions to the “synthetic equity arrangement” anti-avoidance rule in the first instance are no longer operative. It is also interesting that the financial figures that accompanied Budget 2024 indicate that no material, incremental revenue is expected to be collected by the Government as a consequence of tightening the anti-avoidance rule.
The proposed amendments to the “synthetic equity arrangement” anti-avoidance rule will apply to dividends received on or after January 1, 2025.
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2024
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Do You See What I See? Fake AI Cases Can Result in Real Contempt
Reliance on an AI hallucinated case in submissions to the court can constitute a breach of professional obligations and may amount to contempt.
Canada’s Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act: Where to next for companies?
Join subject matter experts from McMillan and Pillar Two for a webinar to support companies in addressing their forced labour, child labour and other modern slavery risks, and to support their reporting obligations under the Canadian Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act.
Why Extended Producer Responsibility and the Circular Economy Demand Boardroom Action
Discussion of global amendments to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and right to repair laws, impacting product lifecycle management and regulatory compliance for businesses.
Québec’s Bill 96: Where we are now after four years and the road ahead
Join Enda Wong, Business Law, Shari Munk-Manel, Employment & Labour Relations, and Émile Catimel-Marchand, Financial Services and Regulatory as they discuss Bill 96, its impacts on the day-to-day operations of companies doing business in Québec, including in the areas of employment, contracting, product design, labelling and advertising.
Put Your Best Foot Forward: New Evidence Requirements for Trademark Appeals
Discussion of amendments to Canada's Trademarks Act impacting timing of delivery of evidence to the Trademark Opposition Board or later to the Federal Courts.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.