


Canada Enacts Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act
Canada Enacts Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act
On June 1, 2015, the Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act (the “Act“) came into force, establishing “publish what you pay” standards for Canadian extractive businesses. As set out in section 6 of the Act, the purpose of the Act is to “implement Canada’s international commitments to participate in the fight against corruption through the implementation of measures applicable to the extractive sector, including measures that enhance transparency and measures that impose reporting obligations with respect to payments made by entities.” As a result, all businesses engaged in the commercial development of oil, gas or minerals in Canada or elsewhere that meet certain criteria[1] are required to report payments such as taxes, royalties, fees, production entitlements and bonuses of $100,000 or more made to any level of government in Canada and abroad.
The businesses subject to the Act will be required to provide annual reports not later than 150 days after the end of each financial year commencing after July 1, 2015. The Act includes a two year deferral to June 1, 2017 of the obligation to report payments made to Aboriginal governments in Canada. In order to minimize the administrative burden, the Canadian federal government may permit reporting entities to meet the Canadian reporting requirements by substituting reports prepared in another jurisdiction whose requirements are determined to be an acceptable substitute. Reporting guidelines are expected to be released for comment later this year.
by Hellen Siwanowicz
[1] An extractive business is subject to the Act if it:
(i) is listed on a stock exchange in Canada; or
(ii) has a place of business in Canada, does business in Canada or has assets in Canada and meets at least two of the following three conditions for at least one of the two most recent financial years:
(a) has at least $20 million in assets;
(b) generates at least $40 million in revenue; and
(c) employs an average of at least 250 employees.
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2015
Insights (5 Posts)View More
“Mend your speech a little, lest it may mar your fortunes”: Are Employee Defamation Cases A Fool’s Errand?
This bulletin discusses the recent decision in Williams v. Vac Developments Limited regarding gag defamation proceedings commenced by employers.
Overholding in Commercial Leasing
The concept of overholding is often misunderstood and deserves more attention in commercial leases, given the significant consequences for landlords and tenants.
Competition Act Amendments on a Rocket Docket
Bill C-56 introduces amendments to the Competition Act, which are described as addressing rising grocery prices, but which have much broader implications.
A Shopping Cart of Competition Law Changes
The Government announced amendments to the Competition Act as part of its announcement regarding combatting escalating grocery prices.
CRA Audit Requirements: Can a Taxpayer Contest Unreasonable Deadlines?
When the CRA demands information or documents within an unreasonable period, what options are available? A recent decision of the FCA offers some guidance.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.