Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Canadian Banks, BDC and OSFI work together for a seamless launch of the new Highly Affected Sectors Credit Availability Program (HASCAP)

February 2021 Financial Services Regulatory Bulletin 3 minute read

On February 1, 2021, the Highly Affected Sectors Credit Availability Program (“HASCAP“) became effective and several Canadian banks have already indicated that they are accepting applications. HASCAP, initially outlined in the federal government’s 2020 Fall Economic Statement, is designed to provide financial support to businesses that have been hit hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic. As a central tenet to the program, Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) will provide a guarantee to the Canadian financial institution providing the loan (Lender) for 100% of the value. The guarantee covers loans ranging from $25,000 to $1,000,000.

In order to be eligible for HASCAP, the business must have been financially stable and viable prior to the current economic situation and be Canadian based. In addition, the business must have received payments either from the Canada Emergency Subsidy (“CEWS“) program or the Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy (“CERS“) program. If the business does not qualify for CEWS and CERS, but otherwise meets all HASCAP eligibility criteria, the business may still be eligible if it can provide financial statements that reflect three months (not necessarily consecutive) in which monthly year-over-year revenue decreased by at least 50% within the eight-month period prior to the date of the HASCAP guarantee application. The business will also need to meet the underwriting criteria of the participating Lender.

The loan being guaranteed can only be used to continue or resume operations, and cannot be used, for instance, to pay off or refinance existing debt.

On January 27, 2021, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (“OSFI“) issued timely guidance to federally regulated deposit-taking institutions (“DTIs“) on the capital treatment of the loans guaranteed by BDC. In short, OSFI expects the Lender to treat HASCAP loans as a sovereign exposure. OSFI has confirmed that the guarantee from BDC meets the relevant operational requirements under sections 75 and 76 of Chapter 5 of OSFI’s Capital Adequacy Requirements (“CAR“) Guideline (meaning that it can be treated as an exposure to the Government of Canada). However, the amount of the guarantee recognized for capital purposes will need to be adjusted, in accordance with section 5.1.6. of the CAR Guideline, if there are currency mismatches or maturity mismatches between the loan and the BDC guarantee.

OSFI has further advised that the following risk weightings are to be applied under the CAR Guideline:

  • under the Standardized Approach to credit risk, the HASCAP loan would receive the 0% risk weight applicable to the Government of Canada (as the loan guarantor) pursuant to section 3.1.3. paragraph 10(i) of the CAR Guideline; and
  • under the Internal Ratings Based Approach to credit risk, the HASCAP loan would be treated with the Probability of Default substitution approach or the Loss Given Default adjustment approach pursuant to section 6.8.7.(ix) of the CAR Guideline.

The entire amount of the HASCAP loan is to be included in a lender’s leverage ratio calculation. Specifically, the loan needs to be included in the exposure measure of the ratio in accordance with paragraph 12 of OSFI’s Leverage Requirements Guideline.

This capital treatment is similar to the expectations for Export Development Canada’s loan guarantee program for small and medium-sized businesses (for which the guaranteed amount may be up to USD 10,000,000).

OSFI will continue to issue direction, as needed, to assist DTIs in ensuring that capital and liquidity requirements are appropriate during the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic.

by Darcy Ammerman and Jeremiah Kopp, Articling Student

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2021

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Update for Ontario Employers: Proposed Changes Related to Remote Workers

Ontario employer's should note proposed amendments to the province's employment laws that would clarify remote employees' entitlements in mass terminations.

Read More
Mar 24, 2023
Featured Insight

Trademark of Foreign Owner Invalidated on the Basis of Bad Faith

Awareness of a senior rights holder’s trademark and its prior use of such trademark in Canada is relevant to the assessment of bad faith.

Read More
Mar 22, 2023
Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023