


Canadian Securities Administrators Propose New Prospectus Exemption for Resale of Securities of a Foreign Issuer
Canadian Securities Administrators Propose New Prospectus Exemption for Resale of Securities of a Foreign Issuer
The Canadian Securities Administrators (the “CSA”) proposed amendments to National Instrument 45-102 Resale of Securities (“NI 45-102”) that create a new prospectus exemption for the resale of a foreign issuer’s securities. These proposed amendments are open for comment until September 27, 2017.
Currently, to be considered a foreign issuer, an entity would need to satisfy, among other requirements, two shareholder ownership tests outlined in section 2.14 of NI 45-102. These tests require that, at the distribution date, residents of Canada did not own 10% of the outstanding securities of the class or series of the distribution, and further did not represent more than 10% of the total number of owners of securities of that class or series.
The proposed amendments include a change to the definition of foreign issuer and a repeal of the dual 10% tests. To be considered a foreign issuer, the new requirement would be that the issuer is not incorporated or organized under the laws of Canada or any jurisdiction therein, the issuer cannot have its head office in Canada, the majority of executive officers or directors cannot ordinarily reside in Canada, and the majority of consolidated assets of the issuer cannot be located in Canada. The proposed exemption further attempts to reduce the links that the issuer has in Canada in order to qualify as a reporting issuer in several other ways. The exemption does not apply in cases where the issuer is a reporting issuer in any Canadian jurisdiction on the date of the distribution or on the date of the trade. The trade to be effected must also be on an exchange or market outside of Canada to a person who is also outside of Canada.
While it is uncertain whether these proposed amendments will ultimately be accepted, in part or in full, the changes to NI 45-102 could prove to be significant for persons engaging in the reselling of a foreign issuer’s securities.
by Sasa Pudar
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)View More
All Things Tariffs: A Comprehensive Overview of Where We Stand Today
In response to US tariffs, Canada has imposed retaliatory tariffs on a wide variety of products. Recent developments now include opportunities for remission.
Who Owns a Thought? Navigating Legal Issues in Neurotech
In this bulletin, we explore some legal considerations that could arise as consumer-oriented neurotechnology becomes increasingly accessible.
Return-to-Office Mandate Triggers Constructive Dismissal (… This Time)
An employer’s return-to-office mandate constituted grounds for constructive dismissal of an employee with a longstanding work-from-home arrangement.
Breaking the Deadlock: How Shareholders’ Agreements and “Shotgun” Clauses Help Resolve Disputes
Shareholder disputes are common in businesses, but a well-drafted shareholders’ agreement containing a “shotgun” clause can help provide a resolution.
The End of a Saga: Application of Due Diligence Assessment Criteria for “Employers” in R v. Sudbury Upheld
The Ontario Court of Appeal issued a final ruling that provides practical guidance to project owners respecting their obligations as “employers” under the OHSA.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.