Canadian Securities Administrators Propose New Prospectus Exemption for Resale of Securities of a Foreign Issuer
The Canadian Securities Administrators (the “CSA”) proposed amendments to National Instrument 45-102 Resale of Securities (“NI 45-102”) that create a new prospectus exemption for the resale of a foreign issuer’s securities. These proposed amendments are open for comment until September 27, 2017.
Currently, to be considered a foreign issuer, an entity would need to satisfy, among other requirements, two shareholder ownership tests outlined in section 2.14 of NI 45-102. These tests require that, at the distribution date, residents of Canada did not own 10% of the outstanding securities of the class or series of the distribution, and further did not represent more than 10% of the total number of owners of securities of that class or series.
The proposed amendments include a change to the definition of foreign issuer and a repeal of the dual 10% tests. To be considered a foreign issuer, the new requirement would be that the issuer is not incorporated or organized under the laws of Canada or any jurisdiction therein, the issuer cannot have its head office in Canada, the majority of executive officers or directors cannot ordinarily reside in Canada, and the majority of consolidated assets of the issuer cannot be located in Canada. The proposed exemption further attempts to reduce the links that the issuer has in Canada in order to qualify as a reporting issuer in several other ways. The exemption does not apply in cases where the issuer is a reporting issuer in any Canadian jurisdiction on the date of the distribution or on the date of the trade. The trade to be effected must also be on an exchange or market outside of Canada to a person who is also outside of Canada.
While it is uncertain whether these proposed amendments will ultimately be accepted, in part or in full, the changes to NI 45-102 could prove to be significant for persons engaging in the reselling of a foreign issuer’s securities.
by Sasa Pudar
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)
Bidders can Structure Offers to Discourage the Use of Rights of First Refusal
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision considers the duty of good faith and honest contractual performance in the context of an asset sale involving ROFRs.
Update for Ontario Employers: Proposed Changes Related to Remote Workers
Ontario employer's should note proposed amendments to the province's employment laws that would clarify remote employees' entitlements in mass terminations.
Trademark of Foreign Owner Invalidated on the Basis of Bad Faith
Awareness of a senior rights holder’s trademark and its prior use of such trademark in Canada is relevant to the assessment of bad faith.
Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.
A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.
On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.