Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Canadian Transportation Agency Closes Submissions on Regulatory Costing Model Consultation

March 2017 Transportation Bulletin 2 minute read

The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) recently invited submissions regarding its consultation on the Agency Regulatory Costing Model (ARCM) in setting rates for interswitching traffic between federal railway companies within prescribed geographic distances and for deriving long run variable costs (LRVC) of particular rail shipments in final offer arbitration.  As the Agency states, the ARCM is an “activity-based costing system that relates the defined activities performed by a railway company in providing rail transportation service, to the financial costs incurred in performing each activity as defined in the Agency’s Uniform Classification of Accounts and Related Railway Records (UCA).” The ARCM estimates “the variable costs [LRVC] incurred by a railway company to perform a movement or service by estimating the variable portions of all the railway activities performed, including overhead activities, and sums up the activity variable costs. The model incorporates empirical relationships developed between the cost of each railway activity and changes in traffic volume to determine the proportion of the cost that varies with traffic volume.” The LRVC relationship to rates charged by railway companies is an important determinant in assessing the viability of transporting freight by rail. Almost all rail freight shippers are affected by the ARCM to some degree.

The ARCM Consultation is a continuation of the Agency’s efforts to “update the proportion of each cost activity that is estimated to vary with changes in traffic volume”.  The Agency’s expert staff undertook a comprehensive review of the ARCM, notably, as directed by the Agency:

  • the existing aggregations of cost activities;
  • the appropriate traffic-related variables influencing the cost activities;
  • the appropriate data for analyzing the cost and traffic volume relationships; and
  • the appropriate empirical methodologies for analyzing these relationships.

Canadian National Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Railway Company made submissions upon invitation. Agency staff then sought “industry views and comments on three underlying issues at the core of the Agency’s regulatory costing model, for consideration and decision by the Agency”: (i) whether cost categories should be aggregated or disaggregated further, (ii) the appropriate approach to determine the variable portions of the cost accounts and (iii) available approaches to address the lack of transparency and reliance on railway data.

McMillan made submissions on February 28, 2017 on behalf of Teck Resources (Canada’s single largest rail shipper), supported by the Western Grain Elevator Association, the Canadian Canola Growers Association and the Western Canadian Shippers Coalition. Our submissions were based on testimony by highly regarded experts in

  • regulatory costing (Mr. Jamie Heller of Hellerworx Inc., John Edsforth of Travacon Research Limited and John Schmitter of KEP LLC)
  • transportation economics (Dr. David Gillen, Ph.D., University of Toronto, Director, Centre for Transportation Studies, YVR Professor of Transportation Policy and Professor, Operations and Logistics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia)
  • econometrics (Dr. Adonis Yatchew, Ph.D., Harvard University, Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, University of Toronto)

Apart from the submissions of the two Class I federal railway companies, CP and CN, that were the object of the consultation, others made submissions, all found on the Consultations Page of the Canadian Transportation Agency website.

Submissions are now closed.

by François Tougas

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2017

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Trademark of Foreign Owner Invalidated on the Basis of Bad Faith

Awareness of a senior rights holder’s trademark and its prior use of such trademark in Canada is relevant to the assessment of bad faith.

Read More
Mar 22, 2023
Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Wednesday, April 19, 2023