Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Captive Insurance Emerging in Alberta

November 22, 2021 Financial Services Bulletin 2 minute read

On October 27, 2021, the Alberta legislature introduced the Captive Insurance Companies Act[1] (the “Act”).  If passed, the Act will expand insurance options for Alberta businesses; a positive development for those currently unable to find adequate insurance in the challenging insurance market.

A captive insurer is an alternative to the traditional insurance market.  The defining characteristic of a captive insurer is that they are wholly owned by the entity they insure.  For example, a parent company may create a captive insurer for the purpose of providing insurance to the parent company.  Approximately 70 jurisdictions worldwide have some form of captive insurance scheme, although British Columbia is currently the only Canadian jurisdiction.  Alberta’s proposed legislation was developed with influence from British Columbia’s legislation and other global schemes, as well as from best practices within the industry.[2]

Among other provisions, the Act outlines the formation and management of captive insurers and licensing requirements, which the Superintendent of Insurance will oversee.  Under the Act, a captive insurer may be formed either as an incorporated body under the Business Corporations Act or as a limited partnership under the Partnership Act.[3] A captive insurance company may insure the risks of a single entity, members of an association, or of a knowledgeable client with complex insurance needs.[4] Accompanying regulations will further outline financial and corporate governance requirements, which are expected to be announced in 2022.[5]

Captive insurers can be used by businesses in any sector, though in Alberta the energy, agriculture, forestry, and manufacturing sectors are expected to especially benefit from this new option.  The President of Treasury Board and Minister of Finance, Travis Toews, says that allowing captive insurance will benefit Alberta businesses by offering reasonable insurance pricing, attracting business, and sustaining jobs,[6] which is in line with the government’s efforts to strengthen the financial services sector more broadly.

[1] Bill 78, Captive Insurance Companies Act, 2nd Sess, 30th Leg, Alberta, 2021 (First Reading 27 October 2021).
[2] Government of Alberta, “Captive insurance coming to Alberta”, (27 October 2021).
[3] Bill 78, supra note 1, s 2.
[4] Government of Alberta, supra note 2.
[5] Government of Alberta, supra note 2.
[6] Government of Alberta, supra note 2.

by Darcy Ammerman and Ricki- Lee Williams (Articling Student)

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2021

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Upfront Compensation for Segregated Funds: Is a Total Ban on the Horizon?

Insurance Regulators are exploring regulatory changes to Segregated Funds compensation arrangement on Insurers, Intermediaries and Consumers.

Read More
Sep 28, 2022
Featured Insight

Too Quick to (Summary) Judge: The Shortcomings of Summary Judgment in Patent Actions in Canada

The FCA addresses the shortcomings of summary judgment in patent cases, along with issues relating to "common general knowledge" and experimental testing.

Read More
Sep 27, 2022
Featured Insight

Land Use Planning and BOMA Standards: Issues and Possible Solutions

McMillan’s Commercial Real Estate and Litigation & Dispute Resolution teams are offering a conference on a variety of current issues relating to real estate development and BOMA Standards.

October 27, 2022
Featured Insight

Just Say No (to Fixed-Term Employment Contracts): Court Awards 23 Months’ Pay to Former Business Owner

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has issued another warning to employers who enter into fixed-term contracts with their employees.

Read More
Sep 26, 2022
Featured Insight

Single Proceeding Model Trumps Contractual Rights – Arbitration Clause Held “Inoperative” in Insolvency Proceeding

Ontario's highest court has held that an arbitration clause may be unenforceable in an appropriate insolvency proceeding, introducing contractual uncertainty.

Read More
Sep 26, 2022