Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

CSA Provides Further Guidance to NI 31-103 Cost Disclosure and Performance Reports

May 2016 Capital Markets Bulletin 2 minute read

On April 14, 2016, the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA“) issued CSA Staff Notice 31-345 Cost Disclosure, Performance Reporting and Client Statements – Frequently Asked Questions and Additional Guidance (the “Staff Notice“), a compilation of frequently asked questions concerning amendments to National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (“NI 31-103“) and Companion Policy 31-103 CP Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations that came into force on July 15, 2013 (the “Amendments“).

The Amendments implement phase two of the CSA’s long standing project on enhancing a registrant’s relationship with its clients, called the client relationship model (the “CRM2“). The CRM2 imposes additional reporting requirements over a three-year transition period from 2013 through 2016. The new requirements are designed to ensure that investors receive enhanced disclosure regarding the costs and compensation associated with their investments and the performance of their investments.

When the Amendments were proposed they raised a number of issues relating to performance reporting, including the choice by the CSA of the “money-weighted rate of return” (the “MWRR“) over the “time-weighted rate of return” (the “TWRR“), which historically has been the preferred industry approach to performance reporting. The Staff Notice clarifies that a firm may show returns using TWRR, as long as the firm also provides the return using MWRR in accordance with the requirements of NI 31-103. Furthermore, the CSA does not plan on publishing an approved formula to calculate MWRR as there are different ways of calculating MWRR.

The Staff Notice also provides further guidance on how the Amendments may affect sole exempt market dealers (“EMD“) as sole EMDs do not normally hold client assets. The applicability of some of the Amendments depends on whether a registered firm holds client assets or, if it does not, whether certain other specific criteria apply. In circumstances where sole EMDs do hold client assets, they must deliver account statements with the prescribed information along with position cost information. Furthermore, since holding clients’ assets is a clear indication of an ongoing client relationship, a sole EMD is also subject to the requirement to deliver an annual report on charges and other prescribed compensation. The Staff Notice provides examples of when sole EMDs are considered to have limited, transactional relationships with their clients as opposed to ongoing client relationships.

For further information on the applicability of the Amendments or the Staff Notice, please refer to the individual regulator’s website.

by Marina Tran

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2016

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Update for Federal Employers: What’s in Store For 2024

Federal employers should be preparing for key dates upcoming in 2024, including updates to the Canada Labour Code and a key deadline under the Pay Equity Act.

Read More
Dec 6, 2023
Featured Insight

Getting the Deal Through – Cartel Regulations 2024

The 24th edition of Lexology GTDT’s Cartel Regulation is the most current and comprehensive source of information about cartel laws and enforcement around the world.

Read More
Dec 5, 2023
Featured Insight

Transformative Change: Your Guide to Canada’s Breathtaking Competition Act Changes

We provide a summary of far-reaching Competition Act amendments proposed in 2023.

Read More
Dec 5, 2023
Featured Insight

Class Actions May Now Be Easier to Defeat in Ontario

It is now clear: the revised preferability analysis under the amended Class Proceedings Act is a strict, more onerous hurdle for plaintiffs to satisfy.

Read More
Dec 4, 2023
Featured Insight

R. vs Greater Sudbury Webinar

Following a brief overview of the case and the SCC’s split decision, this discussion will focus on the implications of the decision to the roles and responsibilities of each project party, including the owner, contractor and design consultant (architect and engineer). The discussion will be interactive and will include an extensive Q&A period.

Details
Wednesday, December 13, 2023