Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Darcy Ammerman wrote about five interest rate provisions to be aware of prior to financing

May 2018 Ottawa Business Journal 2 minutes read

From January to November 2018, a group of McMillan LLP lawyers will be writing for the Ottawa Business Journal about issues such as workplace harassment, filing a trademark application and how to ensure you get paid for construction projects. This month, finance lawyer Darcy Ammerman explains what interest rate provisions to be aware of prior to financing.

Whether you are an individual borrower, a commercial debtor or a lender, below is a summary of some of the most important interest rate provisions to be aware of.


Section 10 of the Interest Act (Canada) allows a borrower who is a natural person to prepay a mortgage loan or hypothec having a term of 5 years or more at any time after the first 5 years, in exchange for 3 months’ interest payments (in addition to the principal and interest owing). This right of prepayment protects individuals from being locked into a long-term mortgage at a high interest rate with either no ability to prepay or with prepayment subject to a large penalty. However, the same rule restricts individuals from negotiating their own prepayment terms which may preclude them from securing more favorable long-term financing.

The provision does not apply to commercial borrowers such as corporations, partnerships, certain trusts or unlimited liability companies, allowing such parties to freely negotiate the prepayment terms of their financing arrangements based on factors such as the perceived risk to the lender, ability of the business to succeed, etc. It also allows lenders to offer different pricing models to commercial borrower clients. On the flip side, small businesses without the expertise or bargaining power to negotiate favorable prepayment terms do not have the benefit of the protections afforded to individuals.

2. Criminal Rate of Interest

Parties to a financing need to be aware of the criminal rate of interest which, pursuant to section 347 of the Criminal Code (Canada), is 60% per annum. Although it is rare for a loan agreement to explicitly state a rate this high, courts have taken a liberal approach to interpretation such that certain fees and expenses to be paid under an agreement may be included in the court’s calculation. It is an offence to receive interest payments at a criminal rate or to even enter into an agreement to receive interest at a criminal rate.

Loan agreements commonly include a provision whereby parties agree to reduce the rate of interest (if found by a court to be a criminal rate) to a rate allowable under law. Such a finding remains at the discretion of the court, but if accepted, may save contracting parties from having to enter into a new agreement, and would allow the lender to recover the maximum amount permitted under law.

To read the full article please head to the Ottawa Business Journal.

Related Publications (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Real Estate Litigation: Summer Highlights

Even in the summer months, the legal news does not let up. Here are some recent decisions and legislative developments as we head into the 2021 fall season.

Read More
Sep 21, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s Employment and Labour Webinar

Join McMillan's annual Employment and Labour Seminar on Tuesday, October 5th as we address significant legal developments and provide practical advice on responding to employee issues.

Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Featured Insight

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms: CCAA Super-Priority Charges Rank Ahead of CRA’s Deemed Trusts

Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. provided much needed clarity regarding the order of priority for unremitted source deductions in restructuring proceedings.

Read More
Sep 17, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s ESG Strategy Sessions

The COVID-19 pandemic and increased concerns over environmental and social issues, such as climate change and systemic racism, have prompted conversations throughout global capital markets.

Wednesday, October 6, 2021
Featured Insight

Divisional Court confirms Environmental Significance of Ministerial Zoning Orders and Importance of Consultation under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993

Review of Divisional Court decision: Ontario’s compliance with Environmental Bill of Rights in passing Bill 197, particularly re: Ministerial Zoning Orders

Read More
Sep 13, 2021