Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Don’t Count Your Efficiencies Before They Hatch: Exploring The Factors That Impact A Railway’s Operating Ratio

July 2019 Transportation Bulletin 2 minute read

Canadian Pacific Railway (“CP”) has significantly reduced its operating ratio in the past few years. From an investor’s perspective, this is a good thing: a lower operating ratio means CP is incurring less operating cost per $ of revenue (i.e., “Operating Ratio” = Operating Costs/Revenue).

While commentary has attributed CP’s operating ratio decrease to an increase in the company’s efficiency (more specifically, operational improvements), our analysis identifies other significant drivers of the operating ratio decrease from 2012 to 2016. We discuss our findings and support for our conclusions in a recent paper presented by Ryan Gallagher to the Canadian Transportation Research Forum entitled “Operating Ratio As A Measure of Railway Operating Efficiency”.

Highlights from the paper include:

  • An analysis of the effect of CP’s fuel expenses on its operating ratio, including the impact of lower fuel prices, over which CP has no control, and improved locomotive efficiencies, which arise from capital rather than operational decisions. The data shows that these fuel-related factors have independently reduced CP’s operating expenses, (and therefore, operating ratio), over the years.
  • An examination of the impact of CP’s freight revenue (i.e., rate) increases on operating ratio, which have increased by approximately 12% between 2012 and 2016. The increase is even more striking when we remove the confounding impact of the decrease in CP’s fuel expenses (which leads to lower freight revenue due to CP’s fuel surcharge tariffs) over those years; subtract that, and the freight revenue increase is closer to 20% over the same period.
  • A discussion of CP’s failure to pass along any efficiency gains to its customers. For example, some of CP’s $432 million reduction in annual fuel expenses between 2012 and 2016 is attributable to improved locomotive fuel consumption. In a competitive market, we would expect those efficiency gains to be shared with customers through reductions in rates or fuel surcharges or both. Since 2012, CP has continued to increase rates and has made no corresponding adjustments to how it calculates fuel surcharges, securing a lower operating ratio at the expense of its customers, or at least the captive ones.

The full text of the paper can be found here.

by Ryan Gallagher, François E.J. Tougas, Lucia Stuhldreier, and Grace Shaw

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2019

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Developer Wins Case Against a Montreal Borough After it Refuses to Issue a Construction Permit in the Context of a Site Planning and Architectural Integration Program (SPAIP)

This bulletin discusses a recent decision in which the court found in favour of a developer who sued a borough in connection with an urban planning matter.

Read More
Dec 7, 2022
Featured Insight

Prior Employee Experience May Enhance Common Law Entitlements

proper termination practices, punitive damages, moral damages, wrongful dismissal damages

Read More
Dec 7, 2022
Featured Insight

Public Consultation Related to Proposed Amendments to the Trademarks Regulations in Canada

Public consultations on proposed amendments to the Canadian Trademark Regulations are underway. Please see this bulletin for more information.

Read More
Dec 7, 2022
Featured Insight

Privacy, Technology and Cybersecurity Issues in Tech Transactions

Full evaluation of a target's privacy, technology and cybersecurity compliance in due diligence is critical for transactions involving technology companies.

Read More
Dec 6, 2022