Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Don’t put your LIFE on the line: US Securities Law Considerations for the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption

February 9, 2023 Capital Markets & Securities Group Bulletin 2 minute read

McMillan previously wrote on the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption (“LIFE”) from prospectus requirements, which as of November 21, 2022, allows eligible reporting issuers to raise limited amounts of capital from the public based on the issuers’ existing continuous disclosure record by filing an “Offering Document” in prescribed form in connection with the offering (see Bulletin). These reporting issuers are able to distribute listed equity securities (or units consisting of a listed equity security and a warrant) without a hold period of four months and one day under Canadian securities laws, which, among other benefits, is intended to increase the pool of possible investors that companies can turn to.

While there are many advantages to this exemption, caution does need to be taken if intending to use this exemption in connection with an offer and sale of the securities in the United States.  While LIFE provides an exemption from Canadian securities laws, issuers must still comply with the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”), and applicable U.S. state securities laws (together with the U.S. Securities Act, “U.S. Securities Laws”), by either registering the securities or relying on an exemption from registration, when they are offering securities to persons in the United States. Importantly, while the LIFE exemption may not have a hold period under Canadian securities laws, this would not affect any resale restrictions that would apply under applicable U.S. Securities Laws.

In effecting cross-border private placements, eligible Canadian public companies frequently rely on Rule 506(b) (“Rule 506(b)”) of Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act to offer and sell securities to U.S. Accredited Investors. However, Rule 506(b) is subject to a broad prohibition on general solicitation or general advertising, which generally limits Rule 506(b) offerings to U.S. Accredited Investors with whom the issuer (or, in the case of a brokered private placement, the agent or its affiliates) have pre-existing, substantive relationships. Unfortunately, issuers seeking to rely on the LIFE exemption must make the Offering Document available on their website, if they have one. The availability of this Offering Document on the website would constitute general solicitation or general advertising under U.S. Securities Laws.

While other avenues may be available to Canadian reporting issuers to ensure that their LIFE offering is compliant with U.S. Securities Laws, issuers that intend to rely on Rule 506(b) must take steps to limit access to the Offering Document on the issuer’s website, such as through the inclusion of geographic restrictions, and additionally should take steps to document the existence of a pre-existing, substantive relationship between the issuer (or its broker-dealer or investment adviser) and each U.S. investor.

If your company is contemplating a LIFE offering – either with or without a concurrent unregistered offering to U.S. investors – and require legal advice, please contact any member of our Capital Markets Group.  Our team includes U.S. securities attorneys with extensive experience in cross-border financing and M&A transactions.

by Herbert Ono, Sasa Jarvis, and Cynthia Sargeant

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2023

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Details
Wednesday, April 19, 2023
Featured Insight

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.

Read More
Mar 15, 2023