Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Dual Reporting and Investigation Requirements for British Columbia Employers

March 2016 Employment and Labour Bulletin 4 minutes read

Background

The Workers Compensation Amendment Act, 2015 (“Bill 9”), received Royal Assent on May 14, 2015 and made a number of changes to the occupational health and safety part of the British Columbia Workers Compensation Act (the “Act”).[1] These changes include the requirement for an employer to undertake a preliminary investigation within 48 hours of certain incidents, and the requirement for an employer to submit a full investigation report to WorkSafeBC within 30 days of certain incidents, unless WorkSafeBC grants an extension.

On November 17, 2015, the Workers Compensation Amendment Act (No. 2), 2015, also known as Bill 35, received Royal Assent and introduced further changes that build on the changes made under Bill 9. These changes require employers to do the following:

  • immediately report to WorkSafeBC all workplace fires or explosions that had the potential to cause serious injury to a worker;
  • provide both preliminary and full employer incident investigation reports to the company’s joint occupational health and safety committee or worker representative, as applicable, or post these reports at the worksite; and
  • specify what the participation of an employer and worker representative in the employer’s investigation of a work-related incident may include.

As a result of these recent changes, employers falling within the ambit of the Act should be aware of these policies and requirements for accident reporting and investigation.

The following are some of the key requirements of WorkSafeBC’s new policies respecting preliminary and full incident investigations and reports.

Accident Reporting and Investigation Requirements

The employer must immediately notify the Workers’ Compensation Board (the “Board”) of the occurrence of any accident that:[2]

  1. resulted in serious injury or the death of a worker;
  2. involved a major structural failure or collapse of a building, bridge, tower, crane, hoist, temporary construction support system or excavation;
  3. involved the major release of a hazardous substance;
  4. involved a fire or explosion that had a potential for causing serious injury to a worker, or
  5. was an incident required by regulation to be reported.

When these incidents occur, an employer must conduct a preliminary and a full incident investigation.[3] Importantly, employers are required to conduct these investigations even when incidents did not cause injury but had a potential for causing serious injury to a worker.[4]

With respect to asbestos, employers must conduct these investigations when the following occurs:

  • an individual encounters asbestos unexpectedly;
  • an air sample indicates high asbestos levels in a clean room or outside area; and
  • an individual sustains an exposure that has the potential to cause serious injury or death.

Preliminary and full incident investigations must be carried out by persons knowledgeable about the type of work involved and, if reasonably available, the employer or an employer representative, and a worker representative.[5]

Preliminary Incident Investigation

Following an incident identified in section 173 of the Act, which includes those incidents described above, the employer must immediately undertake a preliminary investigation to identify unsafe conditions, acts or procedures which significantly contributed to the incident. The employer is also required to determine interim corrective action to ensure work can be continued safely during the interim period between the incident and the conclusion of a full investigation.[6]

A report of the preliminary investigation must be completed within 48 hours of the occurrence of the incident. This report must be provided to the Board upon request, and to the joint committee or worker health and safety representative where applicable, or otherwise posted at the workplace. Reports must include a statement of the sequence of events that preceded the incident and a brief description of the incident.[7]

If the employer takes corrective action, as soon as practicable, a report of the action taken must be provided or posted in the aforementioned way, and a copy of the report may be requested by the Board.

Full Incident Investigation

Immediately after completing a preliminary investigation, the employer is required to conduct a full incident investigation to determine

  1. the cause or causes of the incident;
  2. any unsafe conditions, acts or procedures that significantly contributed to the incident; and
  3. the corrective action necessary to prevent the recurrence of similar incidents.[8]

A report of the full investigation must be submitted to the Board within 30 days of the occurrence of the incident, and provided to the joint committee or worker health and safety representative where applicable, or otherwise posted at the workplace. In limited circumstances, usually when delays are outside of the employer’s control, the Board may extend the time period for submitting the report. Reports must include a determination of the cause or causes of the incident and a full description of the incident.[9]

A corrective action report must also be provided or posted in the aforementioned way as soon as practicable, and a copy of the report may be requested by the Board. If the employer completes the full incident investigation within 48 hours of the occurrence of the incident, the employer must only provide or post one corrective action report for both the preliminary and full incident investigation.

by Louis Zivot and Natalie Cuthill, Student-at-Law

[1] Workers’ Compensation Act, RSBC 1996, c. 492 at Part 3, Division 10 [Act].

[2] Act at s. 172.

[3] Act at s. 173.

[4] Act at s. 173.

[5] Act at s. 174.

[6] Act at s. 175.

[7] Policy Item D10-175-1.

[8] Act at s. 176.

[9] Policy Item D10-176-1.

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2016

Related Publications (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Alberta Recognizes Privacy Tort of Public Disclosure of Private Facts

The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench recognized the tort of public disclosure of private facts for the first time; In deciding the recognize the tort...

Read More
Sep 27, 2021
Featured Insight

Real Estate Litigation: Summer Highlights

Even in the summer months, the legal news does not let up. Here are some recent decisions and legislative developments as we head into the 2021 fall season.

Read More
Sep 21, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s Employment and Labour Webinar

Join McMillan's annual Employment and Labour Seminar on Tuesday, October 5th as we address significant legal developments and provide practical advice on responding to employee issues.

Details
Tuesday, October 5, 2021
Featured Insight

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms: CCAA Super-Priority Charges Rank Ahead of CRA’s Deemed Trusts

Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. provided much needed clarity regarding the order of priority for unremitted source deductions in restructuring proceedings.

Read More
Sep 17, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s ESG Strategy Sessions

The COVID-19 pandemic and increased concerns over environmental and social issues, such as climate change and systemic racism, have prompted conversations throughout global capital markets.

Details
Wednesday, October 6, 2021