Early Warning Enhancements
Early Warning Enhancements
The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) have adopted amendments to the early warning requirements in National Instrument 62-103 The Early Warning System and Related Take-Over Bid and Insider Reporting Issues and associated changes to Multilateral Instrument 62-104 Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids and National Policy 62-203 Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids (collectively, the “Early Warning Amendments“). The Early Warning Amendments are expected to come into force at the same time as the changes to the take-over bid regime on May 9, 2016.The following are the key changes resulting from the Early Warning Amendments:
- Enhanced disclosure is now required regarding the intention of the acquirer and the purpose for the acquisition. This includes disclosure of any intention to change the board or management, sell or transfer material assets, effect a corporate transaction involving the reporting issuer, change the capitalization or dividend policy, change the reporting issuer’s charter or by-laws in a way that might impede the acquisition of control, or solicit proxies.
- Enhanced disclosure is now required regarding the material terms of any related financial instruments, securities lending arrangements and other arrangements in respect of a reporting issuer’s securities.
- It was clarified that early warning news releases must be issued by the opening of trading on the next business day.
- Disclosure is now required for decreases in ownership of a reporting issuer of 2% or more and also for ownership falling below the 10% reporting threshold.
- Lenders are now granted an exemption from the early warning reporting trigger for securities transferred or lent pursuant to a “specified securities lending arrangement.” A “specified securities lending arrangement” is a securities lending arrangement (i) that is in writing, (ii) that requires the borrower to pay to the lender amounts equal to all dividends or interest, (iii) for which the lender maintains records of all securities that it has transferred or lent under such arrangements, and (iv) under which the lender either has the unrestricted right to recall all the securities transferred before the record date for voting or requires the borrower to vote the securities transferred or let in accordance with the lender’s instructions.
- Guidance was added to NP 62-203 regarding the circumstances in which an investor may have to include an equity swap or similar derivative arrangement in the calculation of reporting thresholds. This could occur when the investor has the ability to obtain the voting or equity securities or to direct the voting of voting securities held by any counterparties to the transaction.
- Eligible institutional investors will be prevented from using the Alternative Monthly Reporting System if they solicit proxies to (i) support the election of a director of a reporting issuer other than the persons proposed by management or (ii) support an M&A transaction that is not supported by management or oppose an M&A transaction that is recommended by management.
by Paul Collins, Paul Davis and Adam Kline
 The CSA recently adopted significant amendments to Canada’s take-over bid regime that will also come into force on May 9, 2016. See our bulletin on this topic here.
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2016
Related Publications (5 Posts)
Even in the summer months, the legal news does not let up. Here are some recent decisions and legislative developments as we head into the 2021 fall season.
Join McMillan's annual Employment and Labour Seminar on Tuesday, October 5th as we address significant legal developments and provide practical advice on responding to employee issues.
Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. provided much needed clarity regarding the order of priority for unremitted source deductions in restructuring proceedings.
The COVID-19 pandemic and increased concerns over environmental and social issues, such as climate change and systemic racism, have prompted conversations throughout global capital markets.
Divisional Court confirms Environmental Significance of Ministerial Zoning Orders and Importance of Consultation under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993
Review of Divisional Court decision: Ontario’s compliance with Environmental Bill of Rights in passing Bill 197, particularly re: Ministerial Zoning Orders
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.