Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Franchise Legislation is Coming to British Columbia

November 2015 Franchise Bulletin 2 minute read

The long-discussed Franchises Act of British Columbia (the “Franchises Act“) is making quick strides to becoming a reality. On October 5, 2015, Bill 38 was introduced in the B.C. Legislature. A short 15 days later, it had progressed through Committee and second and third readings, all without amendment.

The legislation will come into force on a date to be set by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, which will likely be sometime in 2016. When it does, B.C. will become the sixth province to enact laws specifically aimed at franchising. It is not yet known, however, when the related disclosure regulations will come into effect.

The Franchises Act was based in large part on the form developed by the Uniform Law Conference of Canada (“ULCC“), which encourages uniformity of laws throughout the Canadian provinces. The disclosure regulations are also expected to be based largely on the ULCC template franchise regulations, as well as recommendations made by the British Columbia Law Institute. The Government of B.C. has opened a public consultation on the proposed disclosure regulations.

The Franchises Act is substantially similar to franchise legislation already enacted in Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, PEI and New Brunswick. Among other things, it:

  • requires franchisors and franchisees to deal fairly with one another;
  • requires franchisors to provide disclosure of financial and other information to prospective franchisees 14 days before a franchise agreement is signed or any consideration is paid to the franchisor;
  • provides franchisees with a statutory right to associate with each other, free from interference by the franchisor;
  • permits franchisees to rescind their franchise agreement in certain circumstances where the franchisor failed to provide adequate disclosure;
  • provides franchisees with a statutory cause of action to sue franchisors for misrepresentation; and
  • voids any purported waiver or release given by a franchisee of the rights conferred by the legislation.

There are, however, some provisions in the Franchises Act which are not common to existing franchise legislation in the other provinces. These provisions, which are largely a response to issues that have been litigated in those other provinces, include the following:

  • disclosure documents may be delivered electronically;
  • the validity of a disclosure document will not be affected by defects in its form, technical irregularities or errors, provided that they do not affect the substance of the disclosure document and that it otherwise substantially complies with the legislation;
  • notwithstanding the general provision making waivers and releases void, releases given by franchisees in connection with the settlement of a specific action, claim, or dispute are not rendered void;
  • certain types of confidentiality and site selection agreements may be signed prior to the franchisor’s delivery of a disclosure document; andfranchisors may accept deposits from prospective franchise at any time, provided the deposit:
    1. is under a certain amount;
    2. is returnable if the prospective franchisee does not enter into a franchise agreement; and
    3. does not oblige the prospective franchise to enter into a franchise agreement.

Franchisors operating in B.C. but not elsewhere in Canada will need to adjust their current practices in order to meet the requirements of the Franchises Act when it comes into force. Franchisors already operating in other provinces with franchise legislation, however, will find that only minor adjustments are necessary.

by W. Brad Hanna and Michael E. Reid

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2015

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Skating on Thin Ice: Federal Court of Appeal Dismisses Hockey Conspiracy Case, While Adding Uncertainty to Motions to Strike

Federal Court of Appeal confirms an important limitation on the scope of the conspiracy offence, but raises uncertainty about the standard on motions to strike.

Read More
Oct 5, 2022
Featured Insight

Canadian Sanctions Revisited: More Russian and New Iranian Sanctions, Including Price Cap on Russian Oil

Canada continues to update its sanctions relating to Russia, Ukraine, and Iran. It will also implement a price cap on Russian oil as part of a G7 initiative.

Read More
Oct 4, 2022
Featured Insight

Good Faith in Business Transactions – Five Considerations for Businesses

The law of good faith continues to evolve. This article provides five considerations for businesses to keep in mind when drafting and performing their contract.

Read More
Oct 3, 2022
Featured Insight

Unpaid Leave for Failure to Vaccinate Not a Termination of Employment

BC Court rules that unpaid leave for failure to vaccinate not a constructive dismissal

Read More
Oct 3, 2022
Featured Insight

Upfront Compensation for Segregated Funds: Is a Total Ban on the Horizon?

Insurance Regulators are exploring regulatory changes to Segregated Funds compensation arrangement on Insurers, Intermediaries and Consumers.

Read More
Sep 28, 2022