Gates are Open for Consultation on Round Two of Competition Act Amendments
On November 17th, the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (“ISED”) announced a consultation on the future of competition policy in Canada, which will lead to further review and potential overhaul of Canada’s Competition Act (the “Act”). This follows a set of amendments to the Act enacted this past summer that, among other things, expanded the Competition Bureau’s investigatory powers, increased penalties for civil and criminal offences, and criminalized wage-fixing and non-solicitation agreements (see McMillan’s bulletin on these amendments here). However, the Commissioner of Competition indicated this fall that the Bureau will participate in the consultation and continue pushing for further reforms to the Act that were not captured in the amendments enacted earlier this year.
During the comment period, which runs until February 27, 2023, ISED wants to hear from individuals and businesses on many topics, including the role and powers of the Competition Bureau, the effectiveness of enforcement and corrective measures, whether changes are needed to the merger review process and the unique issues posed by data and digital markets.
ISED has published a discussion paper listing proposed reforms, notably including changes to the merger efficiencies defence, criminalizing buy-side collusion beyond only labour coordination, and introducing a principles-based abuse of dominance provision. The discussion paper cites a number of thought pieces by members of McMillan’s Competition, Antitrust & Foreign Investment Group, including a C.D. Howe Intelligence Memo by Joshua Krane and James Musgrove titled “The Danger of Precautionary Principle Challenges to Nascent Mergers”, and a National Post article by Joshua Krane, Mark Opashinov and William Wu titled “Vigorous enforcement, not studies, are what Canada’s competition laws need”.
A comprehensive review of the Act will follow this consultation provided the current government remains in power.
If you are interested in participating in the consultation or have questions about how the implemented or proposed reforms may affect your business, members of McMillan’s Competition, Antitrust & Foreign Investment Group are happy to assist you.
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2022
Insights (5 Posts)View More
All Things Tariffs: A Comprehensive Overview of Where We Stand Today
In response to US tariffs, Canada has imposed retaliatory tariffs on a wide variety of products. Recent developments now include opportunities for remission.
Who Owns a Thought? Navigating Legal Issues in Neurotech
In this bulletin, we explore some legal considerations that could arise as consumer-oriented neurotechnology becomes increasingly accessible.
Return-to-Office Mandate Triggers Constructive Dismissal (… This Time)
An employer’s return-to-office mandate constituted grounds for constructive dismissal of an employee with a longstanding work-from-home arrangement.
Breaking the Deadlock: How Shareholders’ Agreements and “Shotgun” Clauses Help Resolve Disputes
Shareholder disputes are common in businesses, but a well-drafted shareholders’ agreement containing a “shotgun” clause can help provide a resolution.
The End of a Saga: Application of Due Diligence Assessment Criteria for “Employers” in R v. Sudbury Upheld
The Ontario Court of Appeal issued a final ruling that provides practical guidance to project owners respecting their obligations as “employers” under the OHSA.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.