


Number of Voluntary Disclosures Continues to Increase
Number of Voluntary Disclosures Continues to Increase
Last week, the Canada Revenue Agency (the “CRA“) issued its annual report to Parliament. Among other matters, the CRA reported on the performance of its Voluntary Disclosures Program (the “VDP“).
The VDP permits taxpayers to voluntarily disclose historical non-compliance, and correct tax reporting and payment deficiencies, in exchange for penalty (and possible interest) relief. (For a detailed summary of the VDP, please see our article on the program here.) The CRA stated in its annual report that there has been a significant increase in the number of voluntary disclosures made under the VDP. In particular, the CRA reported that over the past year:
- More than $1.3 billion of unreported income was voluntarily disclosed under the VDP – a 65% year-over-year increase in the amount of unreported income disclosed under the program.
- $780 million of the unreported income disclosed under the VDP was attributable to offshore holdings – a 157% increase in such disclosures over the previous year.
- 19,134 voluntary disclosures were made under the VDP, representing a 21% increase in disclosures over the prior year.
While the CRA did not provide detailed figures on the penalties and interest waived under the VDP, it did report that it levied gross interest and penalties under the Income Tax Act (Canada) of almost $4.8 billion over the past year. Of that amount, the CRA reported that it waived federal interest and penalties of almost $275 million under various statutory programs, including the VDP.
The CRA attributes the ongoing increase in the number of voluntary disclosures to several factors, including the heightened efforts of the CRA to share data with foreign tax administrators, the agency’s enhanced audit activities, and the use of advanced risk profiling algorithms.
The CRA also expressly referenced its new Offshore Tax Informant Program (the “OTIP“). The OTIP offers financial awards to individuals who provide information relating to certain types of major international tax non-compliance. The CRA indicated that, over the past year, it received 1,920 separate contacts from potential informants under the OTIP, which led to over 200 written submissions and 110 cases that are currently being reviewed.
* * *
The VDP (and the equivalent programs offered under provincial legislation) continue to represent functional and pragmatic avenues for taxpayers to address past tax reporting and payment deficiencies.
If you require more details on the VDP, or would like to discuss whether making a voluntary disclosure would be prudent under your circumstances, we invite you to contact a member of the McMillan Tax Group.
by Michael Friedman and Andrew Stirling
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2016
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Do You See What I See? Fake AI Cases Can Result in Real Contempt
Reliance on an AI hallucinated case in submissions to the court can constitute a breach of professional obligations and may amount to contempt.
Canada’s Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act: Where to next for companies?
Join subject matter experts from McMillan and Pillar Two for a webinar to support companies in addressing their forced labour, child labour and other modern slavery risks, and to support their reporting obligations under the Canadian Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act.
Why Extended Producer Responsibility and the Circular Economy Demand Boardroom Action
Discussion of global amendments to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and right to repair laws, impacting product lifecycle management and regulatory compliance for businesses.
Québec’s Bill 96: Where we are now after four years and the road ahead
Join Enda Wong, Business Law, Shari Munk-Manel, Employment & Labour Relations, and Émile Catimel-Marchand, Financial Services and Regulatory as they discuss Bill 96, its impacts on the day-to-day operations of companies doing business in Québec, including in the areas of employment, contracting, product design, labelling and advertising.
Put Your Best Foot Forward: New Evidence Requirements for Trademark Appeals
Discussion of amendments to Canada's Trademarks Act impacting timing of delivery of evidence to the Trademark Opposition Board or later to the Federal Courts.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.