Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Releases PRPP Filing Guide

April 2017 Pension and Benefits Law Bulletin 2 minutes read

The regulatory and governance regime surrounding pooled registered pension plans (“PRPP”) continues to take shape. In recent months, we have commented on the federal PRPP regime, and its application Ontario, as shown in our previous bulletins: Ontario’s Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act Takes Effect and Update: Federal Pooled Registered Pension Plan Legislation Amended to Recognize Ontario Legislation.

With the federal Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act in effect and tax season now upon us, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (“OSFI”) released its Guide to filing PRPP Annual Information Returns (“Guide”). The OSFI has also released an updated Directive clarifying the deadline under section 58(4) of the federal PRPP Act for filing certain documents (“Directive”).

The Guide sets out various requirements for filing a PRPP’s Annual Information Return, including:

  • Who must file – Returns must be filed by the PRPP’s administrator or the administrator’s agent;
  • Return contents – Each Return must include:
  • The market value of assets at prior year-end and current year-end;
  • The total value of the year’s contributions from employers and members;
  • The amounts transferred to and from registered retirement savings or pension vehicles;
  • Realized and unrealized investment gains (or losses);
  • Amounts used to purchase annuities;
  • Distributions from the PRPP, including amounts of variable payments to members under section 48 of the federal PRPP Act; and
  • Total fees and expenses paid for the year;
  • Investment options – The Return must include the default contribution rate, costs that reduce a member’s return on investment, the net annual rate of return, and information on the top investments chosen and asset allocation.
  • Importantly, while section 58(4) of the PRPP Act requires that documents be filed within three months after the end of the year to which the document relates, the OSFI’s Directive (issued February 15, 2017) permits documents filed under section 58 to be filed within four months of the end of the year to which a document relates. Section 58 of the federal PRPP Act has been adopted in Ontario’s legislation.We will continue to keep you updated as the regulatory and governance regime surrounding PRPPs develops.by Kyle LambertA Cautionary Note

    The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

    © McMillan LLP 2017

Related Publications (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms: CCAA Super-Priority Charges Rank Ahead of CRA’s Deemed Trusts

Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. provided much needed clarity regarding the order of priority for unremitted source deductions in restructuring proceedings.

Read More
Sep 17, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s ESG Strategy Sessions

The COVID-19 pandemic and increased concerns over environmental and social issues, such as climate change and systemic racism, have prompted conversations throughout global capital markets.

Details
Wednesday, October 6, 2021
Featured Insight

Divisional Court confirms Environmental Significance of Ministerial Zoning Orders and Importance of Consultation under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993

Review of Divisional Court decision: Ontario’s compliance with Environmental Bill of Rights in passing Bill 197, particularly re: Ministerial Zoning Orders

Read More
Sep 13, 2021
Featured Insight

Federal Government Launches Consultations on Remedies Against Low-Priced Imports

A review of the stakeholder engagement process for proposed amendments to the Special Import Measures Act and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act

Read More
Sep 13, 2021
Featured Insight

Mandatory Mask Policy Does Not Breach Human Rights Act

Alberta's Human Rights Commission has dismissed a complaint alleging that Costco discriminated against a customer who refused to wear a mask or face shield.

Read More
Sep 9, 2021