


Ontario Human Rights Commission Comments on Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
Ontario Human Rights Commission Comments on Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
In response to various recent events in which the issue of sexual harassment has obtained national focus, the Ontario Human Rights Commission (“Commission“) published on November 25, 2014 an information bulletin on sexual harassment in the workplace.
The Commission’s policy on sexual harassment is not new, with the most recent version (the “Policy on Preventing Sexual and Gender-Based Harassment“) having been published in 2013. However, the Commission’s most recent publication is a reminder to employers and employees alike of the seriousness of the issue. The Commission is also mindful of the increasing scrutiny now being brought to bear on numerous workplaces, with a focus not only on potential misconduct, but also on how such concerns are investigated and addressed.
Ontario’s Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, specifically forbids sexual harassment, including in the workplace:
“7(2) Every person who is an employee has a right to freedom from harassment in the workplace because of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression by his or her employer or agent of the employer or by another employee.”
As a result, the Commission makes clear in its bulletin that Ontario employers have a legal duty to prevent and respond to sexual harassment. Organizations that do not take steps to prevent sexual harassment can face potential legal liability and expenses, along with less tangible risks like decreased productivity, low morale and increased absenteeism.
When deciding if an employer has responded appropriately to a sexual harassment complaint, a Human Rights Tribunal vice-chair is likely to look at a number of factors, including the employer’s procedures for addressing harassment, the employer’s handling of the complaint and the employer’s history.
How can employers prevent sexual harassment?
Employers can often avoid cases of sexual harassment by taking one or more of the following fundamental steps, all of which are strongly recommended by the Commission:
- Having a clear, comprehensive anti-sexual harassment policy in place;
- Ensuring all employees have the policy and are aware of their rights, and their responsibilities not to engage in harassment; and
- Training everyone in positions of responsibility on the applicable policy and their respective human rights obligations.
Ultimately, each employer will want to address workplace sexual harassment in a manner which meets its own unique needs. McMillan LLP’s Employment and Labour Relations Group has a wealth of experience in helping employers address workplace risks such as sexual harassment, including through drafting or reviewing appropriate workplace policies and handbooks, and by providing training to better enable managers to recognize and address such problems.
by Kyle M. Lambert and George Waggott
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2015
Insights (5 Posts)
Trademark of Foreign Owner Invalidated on the Basis of Bad Faith
Awareness of a senior rights holder’s trademark and its prior use of such trademark in Canada is relevant to the assessment of bad faith.
Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.
A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.
On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.
Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award
Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.
Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections
Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.