Ontario’s Sexual Violence and Harassment Plan Act Passes First Reading
On October 27, 2015, Bill 132, the Sexual Violence and Harassment Action Plan Act (Supporting Survivors and Challenging Sexual Violence and Harassment), 2015 passed first reading before the Ontario legislature.
Bill 132 is an omnibus bill that proposes to amend six Ontario statutes, including the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA).[1] If passed, Bill 132 will deliver on commitments under the Ontario Government’s action plan to stop sexual violence and harassment announced March 6, 2015.[2]
The proposed amendments to the OHSA are of particular interest to employers. They build on the changes made to the OHSA in 2010 under Bill 168 which imposed employer responsibilities related to addressing and preventing workplace violence and harassment. A definition of “workplace sexual harassment”, similar to that contained in the Human Rights Code prohibiting harassment because of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, will now be included in the definition of workplace harassment.
In addition, Bill 132 proposes to notably enhance the importance of workplace investigations by adding a number of specific employer obligations in conducting and following through with investigations into workplace harassment (including workplace sexual harassment). These include informing the alleged victim and harasser in writing of the results of the investigation and of any corrective action that has been or will be taken as a result of the investigation.
Most critically, OHSA inspectors will be empowered to order an employer to retain an impartial third party at the employer’s expense to conduct an investigation into an alleged incident of workplace harassment. It is unclear under what circumstances this may occur.
What this means for Employers
The proposed OHSA changes mean that employers will need to be vigilant in addressing workplace harassment. It is noteworthy that the proposed amendments identify both “incidents” and “complaints”. An employer should be aware of its obligations not only when a worker complains, but when the employer otherwise becomes aware of incidents of possible harassment.
Training will be a critical element in ensuring that internal investigators understand the law, how to conduct a proper investigation, draw conclusions from the factual findings, write a report and communicate to the alleged victim and harasser. An employer should want to control the investigation process and otherwise refer the matter to a third party only if it feels it is ill-equipped to investigate the matter itself.
by Kyle M. Lambert and Jennifer Hill, Student-at-Law
1. “Bill 132, Sexual Violence and Harassment Action Plan Act (Supporting Survivors and Challenging Sexual Violence And Harassment), 2015“, 1st reading, Ontario Legislative Assembly.
2. Ontario, “Ontario Strengthening Laws to Stop Sexual Violence and Harassment” (October 27, 215).
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2015
Insights (5 Posts)
Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.
A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.
On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.
Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award
Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.
Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections
Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.
Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”
Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.