


OSC issues proposal on disclosure regarding women on boards and in senior management
OSC issues proposal on disclosure regarding women on boards and in senior management
introduction
On July 30, 2013, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) published OSC Staff Consultation Paper 58-401 Disclosure Requirements Regarding Women on Boards and in Senior Management ( Consultation Paper). The OSC states that the purpose behind the Consultation Paper is to advance the representation of women on boards and in senior management.
As noted in the Consultation Paper, the OSC recognizes that corporate decision-making benefits from a diversity of opinions and viewpoints, and that this diversity is enhanced when leadership roles are filled by those individuals who have different professional experience, individual qualities and attributes.
As a result, the OSC is considering amending National Instrument 58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices to require that TSX and non-venture issuers provide disclosure on an annual basis on the following four areas:
- Policies regarding the representation of women on the issuer’s board and in senior management;
- Consideration of the representation of women in the issuer’s director selection process;
- Consideration of the representation of women in the issuer’s board evaluation process; and
- Measurement regarding the representation of women in the issuer’s organization and specifically on the board and in senior management.
These types of disclosure are intended to provide investors and other stakeholders with information on the issuer’s approach to advancing the representation of women on boards and in senior management, which in turn may impact investment and voting decisions going forward.
proposed disclosure requirements
Each of the proposed disclosure requirements is described in more detail below.
1. policies regarding the representation of women on the issuer’s board and in senior management
Under this proposed requirement, an issuer would disclose whether such a policy has been adopted and, if it has, the issuer would also provide:
A copy of the policy or a summary thereof;
- An explanation of how the policy is intended to advance the participation of women on the board and in senior management;
- An explanation of how the policy has been implemented;
- Any measurable objectives established under the policy;
- A description of annual and cumulative progress that has been made in terms of achieving the objectives of the policy; and
- A description of how the board or its nominating committee measures the effectiveness of the policy.
Issuers without a policy regarding the representation of women on the board and in senior management will be required to explain why they do not have such a policy and identify any risks or opportunity costs related to the decision not to have such a policy.
2. consideration of the representation of women in the issuer’s director selection process
Currently, an issuer is required to describe the process by which the board identifies new candidates for board nominations. The proposed amendment would require an issuer to explicitly indicate whether, and if so how, the board or its nomination committee considers the level of representation of women on its board in identifying and nominating candidates for its board. If the issuer does not do so, it should explain why not and identify any risks or opportunity costs related to such decision.
3. consideration of the representation of women in the issuer’s board evaluation process
Currently, an issuer must disclose whether its board, its committees and the individual directors are assessed on a regular basis on their effectiveness and contribution. The issuer must describe the process it uses and if such assessments are conducted regularly. If the assessments are not conducted regularly, the issuer must explain how it determines that the board, its committees and the individual directors are performing effectively.
The proposed amendment would require that, if an issuer has a policy regarding the representation of women on the board or in senior management, it disclose whether and how adherence to such policy or achieving the policy’s objectives are assessed in connection with the annual evaluation of the board and the nominating committee.
4. measurement regarding the representation of women in the issuer’s organization and specifically on the board and in senior management
Issuers would be required to disclose the percentage proportion of:
- Female employees in the whole organization;
- Women in senior executive positions; and
- Women on the board.
request for comments
In connection with the proposed changes, the OSC is seeking feedback on the proposed changes, including with regard to the following:
- What are effective policies for increasing the number of women on boards and in senior management?
- What type of disclosure requirements regarding women on boards and in senior management would be most appropriate and useful?
- Are the proposed scope and content of the model disclosure requirements set out in Part 4 of the Consultation Paper appropriate or are there additional and/or different disclosure requirements that should be considered?
- What type of statistics, data and/or accompanying qualitative information regarding the representation of women in their organization should non-venture issuers be required to disclose? Should such disclosure be reported for the non-venture issuer only or for all of its subsidiary entities also?
- What practices should the OSC recommend for facilitating increased representation of women on boards and in senior management?
The comment period ends on September 27, 2013.
by Erica Weiss and Alexis Marach
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2013
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Automotive Webinar Series | Part III: Where Rubber Meets the Road: Automotive Litigation Update
At this session, our panel of experts will provide a panoramic view of the evolution of automotive class actions across Canada, a review of best practices for managing disputes with distributors and franchisees, and
insights into litigation and disclosure obligations arising from automotive industry labour issues.
Automotive Webinar Series | Part II: Looking towards the Future: Automotive Legislation Updates
Our panel of professionals will highlight important changes impacting the automotive industry in Canada’s ever-evolving regulatory landscape including updates to cross-border sales legislation, advertising obligations arising from drip pricing provisions under the Competition Act and understanding Transport Canada's lates enforcement tool: administrative monetary penalties.
Nothing Casual about it: Hotel Faces Employees’ Class Action over Employment Benefit Changes
Hotel faces employees' class action over employment benefit changes.
“Mend your speech a little, lest it may mar your fortunes”: Are Employee Defamation Cases A Fool’s Errand?
This bulletin discusses the recent decision in Williams v. Vac Developments Limited regarding gag defamation proceedings commenced by employers.
Overholding in Commercial Leasing
The concept of overholding is often misunderstood and deserves more attention in commercial leases, given the significant consequences for landlords and tenants.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.