Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

OSC issues proposal on disclosure regarding women on boards and in senior management

August 2013 Capital Markets Bulletin/Lexology 3 minute read

introduction

On July 30, 2013, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) published OSC Staff Consultation Paper 58-401 Disclosure Requirements Regarding Women on Boards and in Senior Management ( Consultation Paper). The OSC states that the purpose behind the Consultation Paper is to advance the representation of women on boards and in senior management.

As noted in the Consultation Paper, the OSC recognizes that corporate decision-making benefits from a diversity of opinions and viewpoints, and that this diversity is enhanced when leadership roles are filled by those individuals who have different professional experience, individual qualities and attributes.

As a result, the OSC is considering amending National Instrument 58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices to require that TSX and non-venture issuers provide disclosure on an annual basis on the following four areas:

  1. Policies regarding the representation of women on the issuer’s board and in senior management;
  2. Consideration of the representation of women in the issuer’s director selection process;
  3. Consideration of the representation of women in the issuer’s board evaluation process; and
  4. Measurement regarding the representation of women in the issuer’s organization and specifically on the board and in senior management.

These types of disclosure are intended to provide investors and other stakeholders with information on the issuer’s approach to advancing the representation of women on boards and in senior management, which in turn may impact investment and voting decisions going forward.

proposed disclosure requirements

Each of the proposed disclosure requirements is described in more detail below.

1.    policies regarding the representation of women on the issuer’s board and in senior management

Under this proposed requirement, an issuer would disclose whether such a policy has been adopted and, if it has, the issuer would also provide:

A copy of the policy or a summary thereof;

  • An explanation of how the policy is intended to advance the participation of women on the board and in senior management;
  • An explanation of how the policy has been implemented;
  • Any measurable objectives established under the policy;
  • A description of annual and cumulative progress that has been made in terms of achieving the objectives of the policy; and
  • A description of how the board or its nominating committee measures the effectiveness of the policy.

Issuers without a policy regarding the representation of women on the board and in senior management will be required to explain why they do not have such a policy and identify any risks or opportunity costs related to the decision not to have such a policy.

2.    consideration of the representation of women in the issuer’s director selection process

Currently, an issuer is required to describe the process by which the board identifies new candidates for board nominations. The proposed amendment would require an issuer to explicitly indicate whether, and if so how, the board or its nomination committee considers the level of representation of women on its board in identifying and nominating candidates for its board. If the issuer does not do so, it should explain why not and identify any risks or opportunity costs related to such decision.

3.    consideration of the representation of women in the issuer’s board evaluation process

Currently, an issuer must disclose whether its board, its committees and the individual directors are assessed on a regular basis on their effectiveness and contribution. The issuer must describe the process it uses and if such assessments are conducted regularly. If the assessments are not conducted regularly, the issuer must explain how it determines that the board, its committees and the individual directors are performing effectively.

The proposed amendment would require that, if an issuer has a policy regarding the representation of women on the board or in senior management, it disclose whether and how adherence to such policy or achieving the policy’s objectives are assessed in connection with the annual evaluation of the board and the nominating committee.

4.    measurement regarding the representation of women in the issuer’s organization and specifically on the board and in senior management

Issuers would be required to disclose the percentage proportion of:

  • Female employees in the whole organization;
  • Women in senior executive positions; and
  • Women on the board.

request for comments

In connection with the proposed changes, the OSC is seeking feedback on the proposed changes, including with regard to the following:

  • What are effective policies for increasing the number of women on boards and in senior management?
  • What type of disclosure requirements regarding women on boards and in senior management would be most appropriate and useful?
  • Are the proposed scope and content of the model disclosure requirements set out in Part 4 of the Consultation Paper appropriate or are there additional and/or different disclosure requirements that should be considered?
  • What type of statistics, data and/or accompanying qualitative information regarding the representation of women in their organization should non-venture issuers be required to disclose? Should such disclosure be reported for the non-venture issuer only or for all of its subsidiary entities also?
  • What practices should the OSC recommend for facilitating increased representation of women on boards and in senior management?

The comment period ends on September 27, 2013.

by Erica Weiss and Alexis Marach

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2013

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Canada’s Anti-Money Laundering and Sanctions Overhaul Gets Serious: New Players, More Rules and Broad Reports

Canada’s Anti-Money Laundering Overhaul Gets Serious: New Players, More Rules and Broad Reports

Read More
Dec 4, 2024
Featured Insight

Alert for Advisers: What Registered Advisers Need to Know About “National Instrument 93-101 – Derivatives: Business Conduct”

NI 93-101 - Derivatives: Business Conduct establishes a comprehensive framework for the conduct of dealers and advisers in the OTC derivatives market.

Read More
Dec 4, 2024
Featured Insight

What’s New in the FAQs: Recent Competition Bureau Guidance on the Amendments to Canada’s Competition Act

Commenting on the Competition Bureau's FAQs describing how the Bureau will enforce the amended merger and reviewable conduct provisions of the Competition Act.

Read More
Dec 3, 2024
Featured Insight

Developer-Friendly Changes Proposed for Ontario’s Record of Site Condition Regime

Ontario is proposing to amend its Record of Site Condition legislation to streamline brownfield development and support other development projects.

Read More
Dec 3, 2024
Featured Insight

Buyer’s Remorse: Asset Purchaser Liable for Pre-Closing Employment Liabilities of Vendor

In a recent British Columbia decision, an asset purchaser was held liable for the pre-closing employment-related liabilities of the vendor.

Read More
Nov 29, 2024