


OSFI Publishes Letter on Plans to Update Capital Requirements for Residential Mortgages
OSFI Publishes Letter on Plans to Update Capital Requirements for Residential Mortgages
On December 11, 2015 the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI) released a letter notifying stakeholders that it is planning to update the regulatory capital requirements for residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit. It is one component of the broader attempt on the part of the government to mitigate risks associated with rapid rise in house prices and high ratio of debt to income borrowing. The letter was released on the same day that Minister of Finance, Bill Morneau, announced rules that increase the minimum down payment for newly insured mortgages from 5% to 10% on the portion of house prices above $500,000 and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) announced changes to its securitization programs.
The regulatory capital requirements are in place to mitigate the risk that federally regulated financial institutions face in loss scenarios. Currently, in recognition of the government backstop on mortgages, federally regulated deposit-taking institutions are subject to very low capital holding requirements on mortgages.
The planned changes will affect the deposit-taking institutions using internal models for mortgage default risk, which include Bank of Montreal, Bank of Nova Scotia, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, HSBC Canada, National Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Canada, and Toronto-Dominion Bank. For these banks, OSFI plans to implement a risk-sensitive floor for losses in the event of default that will be tied to increases in local property prices and/or to house prices that are high relative to borrower income.
The planned changes will also affect private mortgage insurers, Canada Guaranty Mortgage Insurance Company and Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Company of Canada, using standardized capital requirements. For these insurers, a new standardized approach that updates the capital requirements for mortgage guarantee insurance risk will be introduced. Both planned changes are devised to provide increased protection to depositors, policyholders, and unsecured creditors.
OSFI has not yet released any guidelines in this respect, but expects to have final rules in place no later than 2017. Prior to any such changes and keeping with usual practice, OSFI will engage the federally regulated financial institutions and other stakeholders in a directed consultation followed by a broader public consultation in 2016.
by Carol Lyons, Pat Forgione, Sean Brandreth, Ehsan Wahidie
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2015
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Automotive Webinar Series | Part III: Where Rubber Meets the Road: Automotive Litigation Update
At this session, our panel of experts will provide a panoramic view of the evolution of automotive class actions across Canada, a review of best practices for managing disputes with distributors and franchisees, and
insights into litigation and disclosure obligations arising from automotive industry labour issues.
Automotive Webinar Series | Part II: Looking towards the Future: Automotive Legislation Updates
Our panel of professionals will highlight important changes impacting the automotive industry in Canada’s ever-evolving regulatory landscape including updates to cross-border sales legislation, advertising obligations arising from drip pricing provisions under the Competition Act and understanding Transport Canada's lates enforcement tool: administrative monetary penalties.
Nothing Casual about it: Hotel Faces Employees’ Class Action over Employment Benefit Changes
Hotel faces employees' class action over employment benefit changes.
“Mend your speech a little, lest it may mar your fortunes”: Are Employee Defamation Cases A Fool’s Errand?
This bulletin discusses the recent decision in Williams v. Vac Developments Limited regarding gag defamation proceedings commenced by employers.
Overholding in Commercial Leasing
The concept of overholding is often misunderstood and deserves more attention in commercial leases, given the significant consequences for landlords and tenants.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.