Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

OSFI Publishes Letter regarding the Tightening of its Supervisory Expectations for Mortgage Underwriting

July 2016 Financial Services and Financial Services Regulatory Bulletin 2 minute read

On July 7, 2016, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (“OSFI“) released a letter advising federally regulated financial institutions (“FRFIs“) that it is tightening its supervisory expectations for residential mortgage underwriting and that it will be reviewing Guideline B-20 – Residential Mortgage Underwriting Practices and Procedures (“Guideline B-20“) to ensure that it is aligned with prudent industry practice and Canadian housing market realities.

Such realities include rapidly increasing housing prices (especially in Toronto and Vancouver), high Canadian household debt and low interest rates; risk factors which have been identified by the Bank of Canada as escalating in prevalence. OSFI’s increased scrutiny is a precautionary measure to protect FRFIs from financial risks such as loan losses through mortgage defaults, and decreased value of real estate pledged as collateral in mortgage loans. The July letter builds upon OSFI’s December 11, 2015 letter which described, among other things, OSFI’s intent to study and update the regulatory capital requirements for residential mortgages and home equity lines of credit (as described in our previous bulletin).

OSFI has identified five areas that will be particularly scrutinized: (i) income verification (especially foreign income), (ii) non-conforming loans, (iii) debt service ratios, (iv) appraisals and loan-to-value (LTV) ratio calculations, and (v) institutional risk appetite.

In addition, and consistent with its plans to update regulatory capital requirements for residential mortgages, OSFI aims to implement various capital policy initiatives by November 2016 and January 2017 for banks and mortgage insurers, respectively, which will better equip FRFIs to endure and manage potential losses stemming from residential mortgage underwriting and mortgage insurance operations. Such initiatives include a risk sensitive floor and a new regulatory capital framework being developed for federally regulated mortgage insurers. OSFI is also evaluating a proposal by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) aimed at increasing the sensitivity of standardized credit risk approaches for loans secured by residential real estate. There is no set target date for the completion of this review.

In addition to increased supervisory oversight and updating capital policy initiatives, OSFI reinforced the need for prudent residential mortgage underwriting practices based on the principles of Guideline B-20 and Guideline B-21- Residential Mortgage Insurance Underwriting Practices and Procedures.

The review and tightening of the underwriting practices of federally regulated lenders will likely result in a decrease in the volume of mortgages and in the size of the mortgages being approved. It remains to be seen whether these mortgages will be picked up by provincially regulated lenders such as credit unions, or if such lenders will choose to similarly follow the guidance published by OSFI.

by Carol Lyons, Pat Forgione, Darcy Ammerman, Sean Brandreth, and Maria Nasr, Summer Student

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2016

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Ready for Change? Bill C-59 Rewrites the Competition Playbook

Bill C-59 has been enacted, introducing significant changes to all aspects of Canada’s competition law regime.

Read More
Jun 21, 2024
Featured Insight

BC Court of Appeal Improves Predictability for Employers Relying on Termination Provisions

In a recent decision, the BCCA provides the clarity sought by employers and employees alike for what is needed for an enforceable termination provision.

Read More
Jun 19, 2024
Featured Insight

Corporate Restructuring Meets Intellectual Property: Quebec Superior Court Overturns Disclaimer Notice and Issues the First Canadian Interpretation of Usage Rights under the CCAA

In the context of a restructuring, the debtor's right to resiliate a contract under s. 32 of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act is far from absolute.

Read More
Jun 19, 2024
Featured Insight

Court Upholds Shareholder-Employee Loan to Acquire a Residence

Discussion of a recent Court decision that a loan to an owner-manager to refinance his home was not a "shareholder benefit".

Read More
Jun 19, 2024
Featured Insight

Time to Get Tough! CARR Provides Guidance for CDOR Tough Legacy Contracts

CARR released guidance with respect to tough legacy contracts in Canada that don't have workable CDOR fallback language; who this applies to; why it was issued.

Read More
Jun 18, 2024