Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image
post

Clorox v Chloretec: The Application of Vavilov in the Trademarks Context

Jul 23, 2020

The Federal Court of Appeal confirms the application of the appellate standard of review framework to trademark opposition board decisions.

post

Trademarks: ‘HERBS R US Design’ Found to Depreciate the Goodwill attaching to the ‘TOYS R US Design’

Jul 15, 2020

In this case, TOYS R US demonstrated that a third party's use of a similar mark likely had the effect of depreciating its goodwill. Find out more here.

post

COVID-19: Accelerated Examination of Patent Applications for Small Entities

Jul 14, 2020

CIPO has begun piloting an accelerated examination process for technologies related to medical products and processes. See this bulletin for more details.

post

Implementing New NAFTA: Agreement on Everything Except the Name!

Jun 24, 2020

This article identifies key sectoral and other changes to the NAFTA, which will come into effect on July 1, 2020 through the implementation of the CUSMA.

post

Material Adverse Effect Clauses in a COVID-19 World

Jun 23, 2020

Review and analysis of recent developments where parties try to rely on MAE clauses as a mechanism to avoid closing a transaction.

post

Making B.C. an Emerging Economy Leader

Jun 23, 2020

Review of the BC Emerging Economy Task Force Report and how BC companies can position themselves to take advantage of the emerging economy of the future.

post

June 10, 2020 Update: Innovating During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jun 10, 2020

This bulletin provides a summary of funding opportunities available in Canada over the month of June and updates
from CIPO and the USPTO.

post

Making Innovation Work for British Columbia

Jun 3, 2020

Analysis and guidance on how BC companies can benefit from the BC Innovation Commissioner's recommendations and help make BC a technology powerhouse.

post

The Admissibility of Patent Prosecution History as Evidence in Canada

Jun 1, 2020

This article summarizes the court's interpretation of the applicability and scope of S.53.1 of the Patent Act (re: admissibility of prosecution history).