Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

POLICY STATEMENT 17 – Extension of the Early Marketing Period

April 24, 2020 Real Estate Law Bulletin 2 minute read

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, on April 17, 2020, the Office of the Superintendent of Real Estate (the “OSRE”) announced the issuance of Policy Statement 17. Policy Statement 17 provides for a temporary extension of the early marketing period for developments marketed prior to obtaining a building permit and/or a satisfactory financing commitment.

The conditions under which a developer can market a development governed by the Real Estate Development Marketing Act prior to obtaining a building permit and/or a satisfactory financing commitment are set out in Policy Statement 5 and Policy Statement 6, respectively. Prior to the issuance of Policy Statement 17, a developer could market such a development for a period of 9 months prior to obtaining a building permit and/or a satisfactory financing commitment, as applicable. This 9-month timeline commences on the filing date of the initial disclosure statement. If a developer does not obtain and disclose the details of a building permit and/or a satisfactory financing commitment, as applicable, prior to the expiry of the 9-month timeline, the developer must cease marketing the development. To accommodate the unforeseen circumstances that have arisen due to COVID-19, the OSRE issued Policy Statement 17, which temporarily extends the 9-month period to 12 months.

The extension applies to developments marketed under disclosure statements filed between June 17, 2019 to July 17, 2020.  For disclosure statements filed between the June 17, 2019 to April 16, 2020, an amendment will need to be filed to note that the early marketing period is being extended pursuant to Policy Statement 17. For disclosure statements filed between April 17, 2020 to July 17, 2020, the disclosure statement will need to disclose this extended early marketing period.

It is important to note all other provisions of Policy Statement 5 and Policy Statement 6 remain unchanged. Accordingly, the rescission right that arises for a purchaser if a building permit and/or a satisfactory financing commitment, as applicable, is not obtained and disclosed within 12 months from the date of filing of the disclosure statement remains unchanged.

The OSRE has indicated that it will consider, on an ongoing basis, whether COVID-19 pandemic response measures warrant any further extensions to the early marketing period provided for under Policy Statement 5 and Policy Statement 6.

If you wish to obtain further particulars regarding early marketing periods or Policy Statement 17 and its proposed implications, we recommend seeking legal advice.

by Dharam Dhillon and Ammen Bains (Articled Student)

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2020

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Update for Federal Employers: What’s in Store For 2024

Federal employers should be preparing for key dates upcoming in 2024, including updates to the Canada Labour Code and a key deadline under the Pay Equity Act.

Read More
Dec 6, 2023
Featured Insight

Getting the Deal Through – Cartel Regulations 2024

The 24th edition of Lexology GTDT’s Cartel Regulation is the most current and comprehensive source of information about cartel laws and enforcement around the world.

Read More
Dec 5, 2023
Featured Insight

Transformative Change: Your Guide to Canada’s Breathtaking Competition Act Changes

We provide a summary of far-reaching Competition Act amendments proposed in 2023.

Read More
Dec 5, 2023
Featured Insight

Class Actions May Now Be Easier to Defeat in Ontario

It is now clear: the revised preferability analysis under the amended Class Proceedings Act is a strict, more onerous hurdle for plaintiffs to satisfy.

Read More
Dec 4, 2023
Featured Insight

R. vs Greater Sudbury Webinar

Following a brief overview of the case and the SCC’s split decision, this discussion will focus on the implications of the decision to the roles and responsibilities of each project party, including the owner, contractor and design consultant (architect and engineer). The discussion will be interactive and will include an extensive Q&A period.

Details
Wednesday, December 13, 2023