Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Procurement in Ontario: Current State-of-Play

March 8, 2023 Government & Public Policy Bulletin 5 minute read

Every year, Ontario spends about $29 billion on goods and services.[1] In recent years, the Government of Ontario has made efforts to modify the province’s procurement practices, but some of these efforts are yet to be finalized. Other initiatives, such as establishing an independent bid challenge mechanism, are yet to be started.

“Buy Ontario” Procurement Legislation is Still Not In Force

One such effort is the Building Ontario Business Initiative. Launched in March 2022, the initiative aims to “reduce barriers and provide companies in Ontario with greater access to public procurement opportunities, helping them sell more goods and services, [and] create jobs in their local communities.”[2]

Last year, on March 3, 2022, the Building Ontario Business Act, 2022 (the “Act”) was enacted as the key pillar of this initiative.[3] However, a year later, the Act is yet to be proclaimed into force. When in force, the Act would require public sector entities to give Ontario businesses preference when conducting procurements for goods and services.[4] This preference for Ontario businesses could have a significant impact; by Ontario’s estimate it could result in $3 billion worth of contracts awarded to Ontario businesses annually by 2026. Beyond this requirement, the Act contains very few details, such as what businesses will qualify as “Ontario businesses”, what mechanism will be used to give “preference”, and what value the procurement must have to trigger the preference.

In March 2022, Ontario indicated that consultations with stakeholders and business associations were underway.[5] Details of the results of consultations have not been released.

While it will be necessary to examine the details of the program to assess its compliance with relevant trade agreements, the requirement to give “preference” to Ontario businesses appears, in principle, to violate non-discrimination obligations for procurements under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement (“CFTA”), the WTO’s Agreement on Government Procurement, the Canada-EU Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (“CETA”), and Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (“CPTPP”). The applicability of the non-discrimination obligation will depend on whether the relevant trade agreement covers the procuring entity and goods and services being procured, and whether the value of those goods and services is higher than the applicable thresholds contained in those agreements.

Supply Ontario Aims to be Operational by the End of 2023

A second initiative of the Ontario government is Supply Ontario, a Crown agency established on November 5, 2020 by Ontario regulation Centralized Supply Chain Ontario[6] under the Supply Chain Management Act (Government, Broader Public Sector and Health Sector Entities), 2019.[7]

Supply Ontario is a centralized procurement agency “enabl[ing] the government to buy as one organization, driving greater value and outcomes for Ontarians.”[8] Its duties include providing and supporting supply chain management on behalf of government entities, broader public sector entities (including school boards, colleges, universities, and social service organizations) and health care entities in the province.[9] They also include collecting supply chain management and vendor performance data from the same entities.[10]

In November 2021, Supply Ontario released a progress report indicating it planned to be scaled up and in steady state by this month, March 2023, and to be fully operational by November 2023.[11] The most recent update was a December 2022 announcement of the appointment of a new CEO as of January 2023, after a series of leadership updates throughout 2022.[12] Few details are available regarding the operations of Supply Ontario as it seems the organization continues to scale up its operations. Once operational, suppliers may find bidding on projects easier because of the centralized body (rather than the current de-centralized approach). Buyers may benefit from supply management services provided by Supply Ontario. However, the full implications for both buyers and suppliers are unclear as the operations of Supply Ontario are yet to be finalized.

Ontario Still Lacks an Independent Bid Challenge Authority

The third initiative, the development of an independent bid challenge authority, is conspicuously absent.

Under CETA,[13] the CPTPP,[14] and the CFTA,[15] Ontario is required to have an independent bid challenge authority. In the 2022 decision Thales DIS Canada Inc. v Ontario, the concurring judgment of Justice Corbett of the Ontario Divisional Court stated that “Ontario is in breach of [the CETA]” in two ways.[16] First, in failing “to designate at least one impartial administrative or judicial authority that is independent of its procuring entities” and second, by failing “to ensure the supplier may appeal” a decision of the decision-maker.[17]

Currently, when bidders have a complaint concerning an Ontario government procurement, they can file the complaint, which will then undergo a formal review by the Director, Program and Policy Enablement Branch, Supply Chain Ontario, Ontario Shared Services, Ministry of Public and Business Service Delivery. This is the process that the applicant challenged as in breach of CETA and the CFTA to the Ministry of Transportation and was referred to by Justice Corbett in Thales.[18] This procedure differs substantially from the more formal bid challenge body at the federal level, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT, which took over the functions of the federal Procurement Review Board in 1994). A bid challenge review body which is more independent than a review by a governmental department may be required as a result of trade obligations and court decisions.

Notably, the procurement chapters of both the CFTA[19] and CETA[20] apply to Ontario’s MASH entities (Municipalities, Academic Institutions, Schools, and Hospitals), and therefore suppliers of these entities may be similarly affected by not having an independent provincial-level authority to which complaints may be filed.[21]

The absence of a bid challenge or review authority in Ontario, modelled on the CITT, contrasts with the New West Partnership Trade Agreement, an agreement between the Governments of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba[22], which arguably contains an independent bid protest mechanism; another example is the Québec Autorité des marchés publics, an independent public body that oversees public procurements in Quebec. It should be noted that not all provinces currently have a separate review body.


Significant changes are in the works for Ontario’s procurement landscape. McMillan’s procurement group will continue to monitor for updates. For any questions or specific advice regarding these issues please contact the authors.

[1] Doing Business with the Government of Ontario.
[2] Ontario Government and Consumer Services, “Province Launches Building Ontario Businesses Initiative”, News Release, March 9, 2022.
[3] S.O. 2022, c. 2, Sched 2.
[4] Building Ontario Business Act, 2022, S.O. 2022, c. 2, Sched 2.
[5] Ontario Government and Consumer Services, “Building Ontario Business Initiative”, Backgrounder, March 9, 2022.
[6] O. Reg. 612/20.
[7] S.O. 2019, c. 15, Sched 37.
[8] Government of Ontario, Supply Ontario, online.
[9] O. Reg. 612/20, s. 3(1).
[10] O. Reg. 612/20, s. 3(1).
[11] Supply Ontario, Our Progress: Establishing our operations and developing the foundations for a multi-year transformation, November 25, 2021.
[12] Supply Ontario, “Jamie Wallace appointed Chief Executive Officer of Supply Ontario,” December 23, 2022.
[13] CETA, Articles 19.17.4 and 19.17.5.
[14] CPTPP, Article 15.19.
[15] CFTA, Article 518.
[16] Thales DIS Canada Inc. v. Ontario, 2022 ONSC 3166, para 172.
[17] Thales DIS Canada Inc. v. Ontario, 2022 ONSC 3166, para 172.
[18] Thales DIS Canada Inc. v. Ontario, 2022 ONSC 3166, paras 26-34, 37 and 168-178.
[19] CFTA, Article 504.3(b) and Schedule of Ontario.
[20] CETA, Annex 19-2.9 Ontario.
[21] The WTO’s Agreement on Government Procurement and the CPTPP only cover Ministries of the Province and 14 listed Agencies. See CPTPP, Annex 15-A Schedule of Canada, Section B; WTO GPA, Canada’s Annex 2.
[22] New West Partnership Trade Agreement, 2022 (see also Bid Protest Mechanism); Autorité des marchés publics. (see also Porter plainte dans le cadre d’un contrat public).
[23] See Xerox Canada v Service New Brunswick, 2021 NBQB 26, para 11.

by Peter Jarosz, Stevie O’Brien, Philip Kariam, and Tayler Farrell

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2023

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Wednesday, April 19, 2023
Featured Insight

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.

Read More
Mar 15, 2023