Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise
Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise
Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise

Proposed Leave for British Columbia Victims of Domestic or Sexual Violence

April 2017 Employment and Labour Bulletin 3 minutes read

Employment Standards (Domestic Violence Leave) Amendment Act, 2017 proposes amendments to the British Columbia Employment Standards Act (“ESA”) which would provide leave for BC victims of domestic or sexual violence.

Proposed Changes

If enacted, an employee who requests leave under proposed section 52.3 of the ESA will be entitled to up to 10 days of paid leave, and up to 17 weeks of unpaid leave, if the employee or the employee’s child has experienced domestic violence or sexual violence.

It is expected that “domestic violence” will be defined as (a) an act of abuse between an individual and a current or former intimate partner, between an individual and a child who resides with the individual, or between an individual and an adult who resides with the individual and who is related to the individual by blood, marriage, foster care or adoption, whether the abuse is physical, sexual, emotional or psychological, and may include an act of coercion, stalking, harassment or financial control, or (b) a threat or attempt to do an act described in (a). “Sexual violence” is expected to be defined as any conduct of a sexual nature or act targeting an individual’s sexuality, gender identity or gender expression that is committed, threatened or attempted against an individual without the individual’s consent, and includes sexual assault, sexual harassment, stalking, indecent exposure, voyeurism, sexual exploitation and sexual solicitation, and may include an act that occurs online or in the context of domestic or intimate partner relationships.

An employee will only be entitled to a leave if the employee uses the leave for one or more of the following purposes:

  • to seek medical attention for the employee or the employee’s child in respect of a physical or psychological injury or disability caused by the violence;
  • to obtain services for the employee or the employee’s child in respect of the violence from a victim services organization, domestic violence shelter, rape crisis centre, sexual assault centre or other social services program or community agency;
  • to obtain psychological or other professional counselling for the employee or the employee’s child in respect of the violence;
  • to relocate temporarily or permanently for the purpose of making future violence against the employee or the employee’s child less likely; or
  • to seek legal or law enforcement assistance for the employee or the employee’s child, including preparing for or participating in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding related to or resulting from the violence.

In addition to paid and unpaid leaves, the proposed amendments to the ESA require employers to accommodate (to the point of undue hardship) employees if employees require variation of their assigned work as a result of domestic violence. In determining undue hardship, cost, outside sources of funding, and health and safety requirements will be considered. Some examples of variation of work include

  • the employee needs to work at a place of work other than where the employer has assigned the employee;
  • the employee needs fewer hours of work; or
  • the employee needs to work at different times than the employer has assigned the employee.

Status of Bill M 235 – 2017

Bill M 235 – 2017 passed its first reading on March 7, 2017. However, this Bill will not progress unless it is reintroduced after the Provincial election. Although we query whether this Bill will be reintroduced, BC employers should be aware of these proposed changes to the BC ESA and may want to review their current policies, practices and procedures on domestic and sexual violence.

by Natalie Cuthill

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2017

Related Publications (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Watch as that Trust is Swept Away

Suppliers and subcontractors in the construction industry should be mindful of a recent unreported decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Read More
Jul 30, 2021
Featured Insight

The CSA Comes Full Circle to Protect the Vulnerable

Amended regulations by the CSA for registrants to protect older and vulnerable clients.

Read More
Jul 27, 2021
Featured Insight

The Ontario Court of Appeal Expands the Range of Damages under the Family Law Act for Loss of Care, Guidance, and Companionship

The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently upheld a non-pecuniary damage award from a jury exceeding its previous guidance.

Read More
Jul 27, 2021
Featured Insight

Amended Sanctions by the U.S. Regarding Investments in Certain Companies in China

An Executive Order prohibiting U.S. persons from purchasing securities of certain Chinese Military-Industrial Complex companies becomes effective August 2, 2021

Read More
Jul 26, 2021
Featured Insight

SOFR Fundamentals: What We Know SO-FAR

SOFR is the preferred USD alternative RFR to LIBOR. We discuss what SOFR is, the types of SOFR, conventions for SOFR, and using SOFR in loan agreements.

Read More
Jul 21, 2021