Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Advisory Council Recommends that Ontario Government Clarify Provisions of the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000

November 2019 Business Law Bulletin 2 minute read

The Ontario government recently established an advisory body called the Business Law Modernization and Burden Reduction Council (the Council) to make recommendations to the government on how to modernize Ontario’s corporate and commercial laws.

The Council has made several recommendations to the Ministry of Government and Consumer Services, including that the government consider amending the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000 (the Act) in order to “clarify existing ambiguities and codify existing business practices”.

More specifically, the Council recommends in its brief report that the government consider amending the Act (and the related regulations) to “prescribe”:

  1. The manner of determining “Total Initial Investment” for the purposes of the minimum and large investment thresholds;
  2. Any changes to the minimum and large investment thresholds amounts for exemptions from disclosure;
  3. The amount of the deposit payment under which fully refundable deposit agreements that does not bind a prospective franchisee to enter into a franchise agreement
  4. would be exempt from disclosure;
  5. The information that must be contained in a Statement of Material Change; and
  6. The accounting standards for financial statements that must be included in the Disclosure Document.

Although the recommended changes are all “house-keeping” in nature, they will hopefully provide additional clarity to both franchisors and franchisees on the above-noted subjects.

The Ministry is welcoming public feedback on the proposals until November 26, 2019.  The full report is available and comments on the proposals can be provided online here.

We anticipate that the recommendations will likely result in a proposed bill being tabled early in 2020, and that the changes will become effective sometime during the spring or summer of 2020.  We will keep you posted as to the specific amendments that are ultimately adopted.

by John Clifford, Brad Hanna and Rupin Sawhney

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2019

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Developer Wins Case Against a Montreal Borough After it Refuses to Issue a Construction Permit in the Context of a Site Planning and Architectural Integration Program (SPAIP)

This bulletin discusses a recent decision in which the court found in favour of a developer who sued a borough in connection with an urban planning matter.

Read More
Dec 7, 2022
Featured Insight

Prior Employee Experience May Enhance Common Law Entitlements

proper termination practices, punitive damages, moral damages, wrongful dismissal damages

Read More
Dec 7, 2022
Featured Insight

Public Consultation Related to Proposed Amendments to the Trademarks Regulations in Canada

Public consultations on proposed amendments to the Canadian Trademark Regulations are underway. Please see this bulletin for more information.

Read More
Dec 7, 2022
Featured Insight

Privacy, Technology and Cybersecurity Issues in Tech Transactions

Full evaluation of a target's privacy, technology and cybersecurity compliance in due diligence is critical for transactions involving technology companies.

Read More
Dec 6, 2022