


Changes to Ontario’s Franchise Legislation Are Underway
Changes to Ontario’s Franchise Legislation Are Underway
Ontario’s Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Legislation), 2000 (the “Arthur Wishart Act”) will most likely see some important changes in the coming months as a result of Bill 154, the Cutting Unnecessary Red Tape Act, 2017. Bill 154 was introduced on September 14, 2017 for the purpose of making it easier for businesses to grow and to streamline the regulatory environment within which they operate. Towards that end, Bill 154 proposes a repeal of some statutes, the enactment of new legislation, and amends several statutes, including the Arthur Wishart Act.
The proposed amendments to the Arthur Wishart Act largely reflect recommendations that the Ontario Business Law Advisory Council proposed earlier in 2016. Some of the key changes to the Arthur Wishart Act set out in Bill 154 include:
- Amending the definition of “franchise” to include relationships where the franchisor has the right to exercise control, rather than the actual exercise of control, over the franchisee’s method of operation;
- Allowing franchisors to accept fully refundable deposits that do not exceed a prescribed amount (the prescribed amount is expected to be 20% of the initial franchise fee, as in British Columbia) without triggering the disclosure document obligation;
- Allowing franchisors to enter into non-disclosure and location agreements with prospective franchisees without triggering the disclosure document obligation (Ontario is currently the only regulated province that does not permit non-disclosure agreements to be signed before delivering a disclosure document);
- Expanding the scope of the disclosure exemption to include the grant of a franchise to a person (or a company controlled by that person) who is currently an officer or director of the franchisor (or who was an officer or director of the franchisor up to four months prior to the relevant time); and
- Clarifying the “large investment” and “de minimis investment” disclosure exemptions to clarify timing and the method of calculating the relevant investment amount.
Bill 154 is already in its Second Reading and is expected to proceed through the legislative process quickly. Text for Bill 154 can be read at http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&Intranet=&BillID=5000.
We will continue to update you on Bill 154’s progress.
by W. Brad Hanna and Cara Zacks
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)
Is Your Arbitration Clause Appealing? No Appeal Available where Clause Says Dispute is “Finally Settled” by Arbitration
The Ontario Court of Appeal considers the type of language in a dispute resolution clause which precludes the right to appeal an arbitration award.
Clocking In and Opting Out: Quebec CAI Issues Warning About Biometric Time Clocks in the Workplace
Following CAI's recent observations, this bulletin provides guidance to comply with the applicable requirements to implement biometric time clocks in Quebec.
Copyright Board Modernizes Royalty Tariff-Setting Procedures for Users
The Copyright Board of Canada has completed Phase 1 of its Modernization Initiative to improve its royalty tariff-setting procedures for collectives and users.
Environmental Priorities in Insolvency Proceedings and the Impact on Lenders: Alberta Court Broadens Redwater Principles
Alberta case Qualex v 12-10 Capital develops line of cases at the intersection of environmental protection and bankruptcy and insolvency law in Canada.
Bill C-13: The Federal Government’s Answer to Bill 96, Notably Imposes New Obligations to Use French in Workplaces for Federal Employers
Bill C-13 - French language requirements for federally regulated businesses in Canada
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.