Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Court Considers Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Reasonable Notice Periods

January 2021 Employment and Labour Bulletin 2 minute read

Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice has issued the first of likely many decisions dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on reasonable notice periods.

The employee in Yee v Hudson’s Bay Company[1] was a 62-year old Director of Product Design with 11 years of service. He was dismissed from his employment in August 2019, approximately six months before COVID-19 was characterized as a pandemic by the World Health Organization.

In support of his claim for an 18-month reasonable notice period, the employee argued that the COVID-19 pandemic had resulted in significant increased difficulty in obtaining alternate employment. In this regard, the employee’s evidence was that he had sent out approximately 90 job applications without success. He submitted that this provided a basis for awarding a reasonable notice period at the highest possible end of the appropriate range.

The trial judge disagreed. In refusing to take the COVID-19 pandemic into account, the trial judge relied on the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Holland v Inc., which says: “Notice is to be determined by the circumstances existing at the time of termination and not by the amount of time that it takes the employee to find employment”. In other words, because termination of employment occurred prior to the start of the pandemic, it could not be relied upon as a factor influencing the reasonable notice period owed by the employer.

However, the trial judge did leave the door open for employees dismissed after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic to argue that they may be entitled to receive longer notice periods. In the words of the trial judge:

“It seems clear terminations which occurred before the COVID pandemic and its effect on employment opportunities should not attract the same consideration as termination after the beginning of the COVID pandemic and its negative effect on finding comparable employment.”

Takeaways for Employers
There are conflicting legal decisions about the impact that a downturn in the economy should have on reasonable notice periods. On one hand, courts have held that an economic downturn may make it more difficult to find alternate employment, and this may justify a longer reasonable notice period.[2] On the other hand, Ontario’s Court of Appeal has said that difficulty in securing alternate employment should not have the effect of increasing the notice period unreasonably – e.g., when employment is unavailable due to “general economic conditions”.[3]

The impact that the COVID-19 pandemic should have on reasonable notice periods is an issue that will likely be heavily litigated in the months ahead. For now, however, employers can take some comfort in the fact that employees dismissed before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic should not receive inflated notice awards simply because a pandemic was later declared during the applicable notice period.

[1] 2021 ONSC 387.

[2] Paquette v. TeraGo Networks, 2015 ONSC 4189; Zoldowski v Strongco Corporation, 2015 ONSC 5485.

[3] Michela v. St. Thomas of Villanova Catholic School, 2015 ONCA 801.

by David Fanjoy and Paul Boshyk

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2021

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Wednesday, April 19, 2023
Featured Insight

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.

Read More
Mar 15, 2023