Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

On the Record: Private Corporations in British Columbia Will Soon be Required to Collect and Disclose Shareholder Information

May 2019 Business Law Bulletin 4 minute read

On April 2, 2019, the Government of British Columbia (the “Government”) introduced Bill 24, the Business Corporations Amendment Act, 2019 (the “Bill”). The Bill passed its third reading on May 14, 2019, and when the Bill receives Royal Assent, private companies recognized under the laws of British Columbia will be required to create a “transparency register”. The Government intends for the transparency register to help mitigate criminal activity, such as tax evasion and money laundering, by requiring private companies to maintain detailed information about certain shareholders.

Required Disclosure

The Bill will amend the B.C. Business Corporations Act (“BCBCA”) to require every private B.C. company to maintain a transparency register identifying all “significant individuals”, meaning all shareholders who:

  1. own more than 25% of the issued shares of the company, or shares that carry 25% or more of the rights to vote at a general meeting, in each case whether as a registered or beneficial owner and whether directly or indirectly;
  2. have the right or ability, directly or indirectly, to elect, appoint, or remove one or more of the company’s directors, or the ability to exercise direct and significant influence over an individual who has that right or ability; or
  3. have a prescribed interest, right, or ability.

Notably, if a shareholder is a non-individual entity, the register must disclose the significant individual who ultimately controls, directly or indirectly, such entity. This means companies will be required to look up the chain of their shareholder structure until all significant individuals have been identified on the transparency register.

The transparency register must include the following information for each significant individual:

  • the shareholder’s full name, date of birth, and last known address;
  • whether the shareholder is a Canadian citizen or a permanent resident of Canada, and if not, every country or state of which they are a citizen;
  • whether the shareholder is resident in Canada for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada);
  • the date on which the shareholder became or ceased to be a significant individual in respect of the company;
  • a description of how the individual meets the criteria of a significant individual; and
  • prescribed information, if any.

If a private company determines that there are no individuals who qualify as significant individuals, the company must include a statement to that effect in the transparency register. If a private company is unable to obtain or confirm any information in respect of a significant individual, the company must include a summary of the steps taken to obtain or confirm this information.

Updating the Transparency Register

Companies must update their transparency register within 30 days of becoming aware of any relevant new information and perform an annual review to ensure accuracy of the information. Companies must also notify each significant individual added to the transparency register within 10 days of each such addition.

Who Has Access to the Transparency Register?

Only directors of the company or inspecting officials may review the company’s transparency register. The categories of inspecting officials contemplated in the Bill are tax authorities, law enforcement officers, and regulators.

Shareholders Obligated to Provide Information

Upon receiving a request for information from the company, shareholders must promptly compile and send the required information to the company.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

If a company fails to identify all significant individuals (or falsely identifies a significant individual) or provides false or misleading material facts about significant individuals (or omits material facts about significant individuals), the company and any involved directors or officers are liable for fines up to $50,000 for individuals and up to $100,000 for corporations. However, a company will not be guilty of an offence if the company did not know, and could not have known with the exercise of reasonable diligence, that the identification or exclusion of the significant individual was incorrect or that the information about a significant individual was false or misleading.

Shareholders will also be liable for fines of up to $50,000 for individuals and up to $100,000 for corporations if they fail to send the company applicable requested information or provide false information.

Implications of Increased Transparency

The Bill signals the increasing transparency of corporate ownership and is consistent with similar changes for federally incorporated private companies under the Canada Business Corporations Act (coming into force in June 2019) and the proposed Land Owner Transparency Act (British Columbia), which will require disclosure of beneficial ownership of land in B.C. if it becomes law. The Bill’s proposed legislative changes are part of a trend to lessen the attractiveness of B.C. as a jurisdiction for shell companies and other legal entities to hide wealth, evade taxes, and launder money.

Effect on your Company

When the Bill becomes law, B.C.’s private companies will be required, as of a date to be set by regulation approved by Cabinet, to establish a detailed register of all significant individuals falling within the scope of the amendments. In addition, companies that do not have qualifying significant individuals must still maintain a transparency register containing a statement to that effect. Maintaining the transparency register will involve time, expense, and significant diligence. To avoid penalties, companies will also need to comply with their annual review requirements and promptly amend their transparency registers within 30 days of receiving any relevant information.

by Rebecca Rock and Marta Miazek, Articled Student

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2019

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Do You See What I See? Fake AI Cases Can Result in Real Contempt

Reliance on an AI hallucinated case in submissions to the court can constitute a breach of professional obligations and may amount to contempt.

Read More
May 11, 2025
Featured Insight

Canada’s Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act: Where to next for companies?

Join subject matter experts from McMillan and Pillar Two for a webinar to support companies in addressing their forced labour, child labour and other modern slavery risks, and to support their reporting obligations under the Canadian Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act.

Details
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Featured Insight

Why Extended Producer Responsibility and the Circular Economy Demand Boardroom Action

Discussion of global amendments to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and right to repair laws, impacting product lifecycle management and regulatory compliance for businesses.

Read More
May 6, 2025
Featured Insight

Québec’s Bill 96: Where we are now after four years and the road ahead

Join Enda Wong, Business Law, Shari Munk-Manel, Employment & Labour Relations, and Émile Catimel-Marchand, Financial Services and Regulatory as they discuss Bill 96, its impacts on the day-to-day operations of companies doing business in Québec, including in the areas of employment, contracting, product design, labelling and advertising.

May 5, 2025
Featured Insight

Put Your Best Foot Forward: New Evidence Requirements for Trademark Appeals

Discussion of amendments to Canada's Trademarks Act impacting timing of delivery of evidence to the Trademark Opposition Board or later to the Federal Courts.

Read More
Apr 30, 2025