


Pay No Attention to the Blinking Red Light: Employee Monitoring Laws Announced in Ontario
Pay No Attention to the Blinking Red Light: Employee Monitoring Laws Announced in Ontario
The Ontario Ministry of Labour has released Bill 88, the Working for Workers Act, 2022. Among other things, this proposed legislation would require employers to adopt disclosure practices related to employee monitoring. Like the recently enacted “right to disconnect” provisions, these changes to the Employment Standards Act (“ESA”) would provide yet another government response to the rise of remote work and its unique dynamics.
The new remote monitoring law would amend Ontario’s ESA to require employers with 25 or more employees to adopt a written policy containing information on whether, how, and in what circumstances the employer monitors employee behavior through electronic devices.[1] The intent of the law is to provide transparency for workers about employer practices, and to protect worker privacy.
Employee monitoring technology can take a variety of forms, including computer monitoring systems (e.g., keystroke or cursor tracking, or screen recording), GPS systems in company vehicles, smartphones, or other devices, or even facial recognition technologies run through computer cameras. Employers may wish to monitor employees to assess productivity, oversee compliance with company policies, or protect intellectual property. As has been reported by media, some employers may even deploy facial recognition technologies to assess employees’ mood in order to monitor workplace mental health.
While new and potentially more privacy-invasive monitoring technologies emerge, businesses should strive to balance their management priorities with the individual privacy rights of their employees. Notably, the Working for Workers Act, 2022 provides that an employer’s ability to use information obtained through electronic monitoring will remain unaffected by its provisions.[2]
The draft legislation indicates that employers will have six months to draft their policies, and the Ministry has stated that it will provide additional guidance on what these policies must contain.[3] Once effected, Ministry of Labour inspectors will enforce the new provisions.
We will continue to monitor these developments.
[1] Bill 88, Working for Workers Act, 2022, s. 41.1.1.
[2] Ibid, s.41.1.1 (7)
[3] Ibid, s.41.1.1 (2)
by Ioana Pantis, Robbie Grant, and Matti Thurlin (Articling Student)
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2022
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Double the Trouble: The BCCA Refuses to Strike Duplicative Class Actions Before Certification
Class action bulletin. Summary of InvestorCOM Inc. v. L'Anton, 2025 BCCA 40, a recent decision of the BCCA on the issue of duplicative class actions.
Recent Developments in the Canadian Psychedelics Industry
This bulletin provides an update on recent developments in Canada's psychedelics industry.
Company Ordered to Cease Using Facial Recognition Technology to Monitor Access to its Facilities: Overview of Quebec Privacy Regulator’s Decision
In this bulletin, we provide an overview of the Quebec privacy regulator's decision in ordering the Company to cease using its facial recognition technology.
Significant Changes to the Québec Mining Regime are Now in Force
Significant amendments to the Québec mining regime tabled by the Government in the spring 2024 came into force late last year.
Thumbs Up or Signed Deal? Court Affirms Emoji as Valid Acceptance of Agreement
We discuss the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal's decision on whether a “thumbs up” emoji sent through a text message is acceptance of a contract.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.