Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

The Fixed-Term Employment Contract: It’s Your Funeral

September 2019 Employment and Labour Bulletin 3 minutes read

Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice has issued a stark reminder of the perils of fixed-term employment contracts.  In McGuinty v. 1845035 Ontario Inc. (McGuinty Funeral Home),[1] released in July of this year, the Court awarded nine years worth of wrongful dismissal damages to an employee whose fixed-term contract was terminated early by the employer.

Background

The employee, Grant McGuinty, was the former owner of the McGuinty Funeral Home in North Bay.  In 2012, he sold his interest to a group of buyers for more than $1.8-million.  Among other things, the purchase agreement included a term that Mr. McGuinty would enter into a Transitional Consulting Services Agreement (“TCSA”) pursuant to which he would remain in the new owners’ employ as their General Manager for a period of 10 years.  The TCSA provided that Mr. McGuinty would earn an annual salary of $100,000 plus commissions, benefits coverage, a company vehicle, gas reimbursement and a golf club membership.

Only eleven months into the TCSA, Mr. McGuinty commenced a medical leave of absence due to stress allegedly caused by issues that arose with the new owners.  According to Mr. McGuinty, the new owners had improperly terminated his use of the company vehicle; revoked his gas reimbursement privilege; recruited an employee who was subordinate to Mr. McGuinty in order to track his hours of work; failed to pay him commissions to which he was entitled; assigned him to a desk in the basement kitchen; and abruptly changed the locks to the funeral home without providing a set of keys.

Unable to return to work following two years of medical leave, Mr. McGuinty opted to sue the new owners for constructive dismissal.[2]

Decision

The Court found that the new owners’ course of conduct amounted to constructive dismissal.  In particular, the Court opined that when the company vehicle and gas reimbursement were taken away from Mr. McGuinty, there was an effective reduction in salary of $12,000 or 12%.  In the Court’s view, this was a “significant” reduction.  The Court also held that changing the locks to the funeral home constituted a  significant derogation of Mr. McGuinty’s ability to act in the role of General Manager.

In assessing damages, the Court relied on the Ontario Court of Appeal’s (“ONCA”) landmark decision in Howard v. Benson Group Inc.  In that case, the ONCA held that – in the absence of an enforceable early-termination clause – when an employer terminates an employee prior to the end of his or her fixed-term contract, the employer must pay the employee his or her compensation to the end of the term as “liquidated damages” (without any obligation on the employee’s part to mitigate).

In Mr. McGuinty’s case, the Court found that his fixed-term contract did not contain an early-termination clause.  Therefore, he was entitled to receive his compensation to the end of the 10-year term.  In particular, the Court ordered the new owners to pay Mr. McGuinty for:

  • loss of his annual salary for nine years ($900,000);
  • loss of commissions for 9 years ($167,173.83);[3]
  • loss of his use of the company vehicle and gas reimbursement for 9 years ($108,000);
  • loss of medical, dental, life and disability coverage for 9 years ($90,000); and
  • loss of the golf membership for 9 years ($9,000).

In total, the new owners were ordered to pay Mr. McGuinty $1,274,173.83 in damages plus legal costs.

Conclusion

This case serves as an important reminder to employers: use fixed-term employment contracts at your own risk.

Fixed-term employment contracts can be a practical management tool in certain situations, such as in order to attract key talent or to ensure the completion of a short-term project.  In most other cases, however, they can result in unexpected costs and liability for the employer.  Instead of offering fixed-term employment contracts, employers should consider limiting their liability by offering indefinite-term employment contracts with enforceable termination clauses.

When fixed-term employment contracts are considered absolutely necessary for business reasons, employers must ensure that they are clearly drafted and – most importantly – contain an enforceable early-termination clause.

by Paul Boshyk and Chiedza Museredza

[1] 2019 ONSC 4108.
[2] Constructive dismissal arises when an employer’s conduct evinces an intention to no longer be bound by the employment contract, and the employee treats that conduct as a repudiation of the contract by the employer.
[3] 5% commission of pre-arranged funerals plus 65% of the marketing allowance.

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2019

Related Publications (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms: CCAA Super-Priority Charges Rank Ahead of CRA’s Deemed Trusts

Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. provided much needed clarity regarding the order of priority for unremitted source deductions in restructuring proceedings.

Read More
Sep 17, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s ESG Strategy Sessions

The COVID-19 pandemic and increased concerns over environmental and social issues, such as climate change and systemic racism, have prompted conversations throughout global capital markets.

Details
Wednesday, October 6, 2021
Featured Insight

Divisional Court confirms Environmental Significance of Ministerial Zoning Orders and Importance of Consultation under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993

Review of Divisional Court decision: Ontario’s compliance with Environmental Bill of Rights in passing Bill 197, particularly re: Ministerial Zoning Orders

Read More
Sep 13, 2021
Featured Insight

Federal Government Launches Consultations on Remedies Against Low-Priced Imports

A review of the stakeholder engagement process for proposed amendments to the Special Import Measures Act and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act

Read More
Sep 13, 2021
Featured Insight

Mandatory Mask Policy Does Not Breach Human Rights Act

Alberta's Human Rights Commission has dismissed a complaint alleging that Costco discriminated against a customer who refused to wear a mask or face shield.

Read More
Sep 9, 2021