Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Quebec Simplifies Grants of Security in Favour of The Agent for a Syndicate of Lenders

April 2015 Financial Services 3 minute read

With the passing last week of An Act mainly to implement certain provisions of the Budget Speech of 4 June 2014 and return to a balance budget in 2015-2016 (the “Act“), which received assent on April 21, 2015, the Quebec government has simplified the process for granting security in the province in favour of a syndicate of lenders and brought that process in line with that under the personal property security legislation of the common-law provinces (“PPSAs“) and the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC“).

While the UCC and the PPSAs explicitly allow a debtor to grant security in favour of an agent, for and on behalf of present and future creditors, the absence of similar provisions in Quebec law have historically made doing so far more difficult. Since nothing in the Civil Code of Québec (“CCQ“) directly permitted the granting of security in favour of a third party, it was necessary to create a more complex, indirect structure which often led to confusion and increased costs for lenders based outside the province and their counsel.[1] As a result of the changes to Article 2692 of the CCQ embodied in the Act, this cumbersome structure is no longer necessary. Also problematic under the old formulation of Article 2692 was the requirement that a particular notarial form of hypothec be used in all cases where the obligations secured included payment of a title of indebtedness, even if there was only a single creditor. This requirement led most legal practitioners in Quebec to strongly resist the practice, almost universal in other jurisdictions, of issuing promissory notes for indebtedness where the payment thereof would be secured by a hypothec, for fear that the hypothec would be invalidated if not in notarial form.

The terms of the new Article 2692 of the CCQ now explicitly provide that a legal person, partnership or trustee may grant a hypothec in favour of the “hypothecary representative” for all present and future creditors of the obligations secured. Such hypothecary representative may be appointed either by the debtor or one of the creditors, and may be a creditor of the secured obligations, or a third party. Any obligations may be secured in this way and the ability to secure obligations in favour of a third party is no longer limited to the payment of titles of indebtedness. The hypothec granted in favour of a hypothecary representative must still be in notarial form, with certain exceptions.

Moreover, while it is still possible under the new provision to appoint a third party to hold a hypothec securing payment of a title of indebtedness, it is now also possible for a creditor in a non-syndicated transaction to hold such security directly, thereby avoiding the additional cost and formalities involved in using a notarial form of hypothec. Furthermore, a creditor can now obtain promissory notes from a borrower, without any concern that doing so might invalidate the hypothec granted by the borrower in his favour, even if it was not in notarial form.

Overall, the amendments have simplified and clarified the mechanism for taking security in the context of a syndicated loan and brought them into line with the practice in other North American jurisdictions.

by Yonatan Petel

[1] The most commonly used structure involved the granting of a hypothec by the debtor in favour of an agent appointed as the person holding the power of attorney (“fondé de pouvoir“) for the present and future creditors, the issuance of a collateral demand debenture in favour of that agent under and secured by such hypothec, followed by the pledge of the debenture in favour of the syndicate members, to be held by the agent on their behalf.

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2015

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Reviving Data Breach Class Actions: BC Court of Appeal Breathes New Life into Canadian Privacy and Cybersecurity Litigation

BCCA decisions revive support for Canadian data breach class actions after the viability of such proceedings was stifled by a trio of decisions from the ONCA.

Read More
Jul 18, 2024
Featured Insight

Understanding Quebec’s New Complaint Handling Regulation in the Financial Sector

This bulletin summarizes Quebec's new Regulation on complaint handling in the financial sector effective July 1, 2025.

Read More
Jul 17, 2024
Featured Insight

Energy Insight – Making Dollars and Sense of Carbon Markets – Part 2: Carbon Pricing

We examine the economic and policy challenges associated with carbon pricing systems.

Read More
Jul 10, 2024
Featured Insight

Purchaser in the Driver’s Seat: Ontario Court of Appeal Enforces Commercial Non-Compete

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision affirms that non-competes within a sale of business context are presumed enforceable.

Read More
Jul 9, 2024
Featured Insight

Bill C-59’s Expansion of the Competition Act’s Deceptive Marketing Practices: “Greenwashing” and Steering Clear of Environmental Misrepresentation

Guidance on the amendments to the deceptive marketing practices provisions in the Competition Act designed to "crack down" on "greenwashing".

Read More
Jul 8, 2024