Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise
Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise
Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise

Recent Privacy Concerns Call for Increased Transparency and Control

April 2018 Privacy and Data Security Bulletin Mitch Koczerginski

In the midst of the Cambridge Analytica data scandal, businesses should consider whether their data handling practices are consistent with user expectations.

Facebook recently announced upcoming changes to its privacy policies to give its users more control over what information may be collected, used and shared with third parties.

The changes will first take effect in Europe in response to the EU’s new General Data Protection Regulation. Eventually, all users, regardless of their location, will be asked to review and make choices regarding Facebook’s use of their data.

Users will be asked to decide whether:

  • to permit Facebook to use data from partners, such as websites and apps that collect information about what users like, to tailor advertisements;
  • to continue to share political, religious, and relationship information, and whether to allow Facebook to use this information; and
  • users in EU and Canada want to opt into Facebook’s facial recognition technology.

Facebook’s facial recognition technology detects untagged faces and prompts both the person posting an image and the users appearing in it to apply the relevant name tags. It also helps Facebook detect when a third party is using a stolen photo, and is used to make “new friends” suggestions to users. For now, users outside of the EU and Canada will continue to be subject to the use of facial recognition unless they opt out of the system.

These privacy changes are a part of  Facebook’s requirement to comply with the EU laws that  require explicit permission from users, and the broader push to address concerns over Facebook’s handling of user data. In 2012, Facebook had to withdraw the use of facial recognition technology in EU due to objections from data privacy groups. In Canada, facial technology will be offered for the first time since its launch in 2011.

Canadian privacy law also generally requires individuals to consent to the collection of their personal information and for organizations to be transparent regarding their use and disclosure practices. Express consent is required to collect biometric information.[1]

The Cambridge Analytica data scandal highlights the necessity for organizations to be transparent about the type of personal information that they collect, the reasons for doing so and to whom such information may be shared. Facebook already faces a class action lawsuit in the U.S. for collecting or storing users’ biometric information without prior notification and consent.

Businesses should continue to review and update their privacy policies and practices to ensure compliance with applicable privacy legislation and consistency with the reasonable expectations of their customers.

by Mitch Koczerginski and Guneev Bhinder, Student-at-Law

[1] The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, “Guidelines for Identification and Authentication” (2016).

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2018

 

Related Publications

post
Publication

LIBOR Newsflash: Announcement on Official Cessation of LIBOR is Expected Soon

Feb 18, 2021

IBA and FCA expected to make announcement about the official cessation of LIBOR. Timelines for ceasing new issuances of LIBOR loans.

post
Publication

CSA Propose Changes to Registration Information, Outside Activities and Reporting Requirements as part of Reduction of Regulatory Burden Initiative

Feb 17, 2021

February 4, 2021 - the Canadian Securities Administrators have proposed amendments to the registration information provided by registered individuals and firms.

post
Publication

More Clarity About the Impact of COVID-19 on Reasonable Notice Periods

Feb 17, 2021

Iriotakis v. Peninsula Employment Services Limited is the latest case to consider the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reasonable notice periods.