Remember…the 11th of November? Remembrance Day Becomes a Legal Holiday
On March 1, 2018, An Act to amend the Holidays Act (Remembrance Day) received royal assent and became law. The Act changes the wording and status of Remembrance Day (November 11) in the federal Holidays Act by making it a legal holiday, like Canada Day and Victoria Day. However, for most Canadians and members of Canada’s workforce, this change is no more than a symbolic gesture.
At present, each province and territory determines which days will be recognized as statutory holidays in their respective jurisdiction. Remembrance Day was already recognized as a statutory holiday for federally regulated workers under the Canada Labour Code. All of the other provinces and territories – with the exception of Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, and Nova Scotia – also already recognized Remembrance Day as a statutory holiday.
Of the four outlier provinces, Ontario and Quebec are the only two that have not enacted some form of observance legislation. Although not a statutory holiday per se, Manitoba and Nova Scotia observe Remembrance Day by requiring holiday pay, the closure of certain businesses on the morning of November 11, and a suspension of operations at open establishments to observe three minutes of silence at the 11 o’clock hour. With Remembrance Day now an official federal legal holiday, where does that leave Ontario and Quebec?
During the legislative debates, Members of Parliament made clear that the federal government could not mandate observance of Remembrance Day across Canada, but that the change to the federal act could function as a symbolic gesture and a good opportunity for the outlier provinces to revisit how Remembrance Day is observed in their jurisdiction.
Given that significant amendments to Ontario’s labour and employment legislation were also recently enacted, it remains to be seen whether Ontario will revisit its approach to Remembrance Day this year or in the years to come.
By Stefanie Di Francesco and Alexis Lemajic (Articling Student)
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2018
Insights (5 Posts)View More
R. vs Greater Sudbury Webinar
Following a brief overview of the case and the SCC’s split decision, this discussion will focus on the implications of the decision to the roles and responsibilities of each project party, including the owner, contractor and design consultant (architect and engineer). The discussion will be interactive and will include an extensive Q&A period.
Client Alert – Certain Canadian Corporations May Be Subject to US Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Requirements
Certain Canadian Corporations Conducting Business in the United States May Be Subject to US Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Requirements
Could it be True? Canada to Introduce Open Banking Legislation
On November 21, 2023, the Government of Canada released its 2023 Fall Economic Statement. The Economic Statement announced the federal government's intention.
Net Zero Plans Deserve Closer Attention Than They Are Getting
This bulletin provides guidance for companies on practices around net zero plans
Necessary Guidance: Ontario Capital Markets Tribunal Provides Key Insights on the ‘Necessary Course of Business’ Exception in Kraft (Re)
The first application of the "necessary course of business" defense to tipping, Kraft (Re) offers key insights when handling material non-public information.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.