Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Russian Telecoms Newest Target of Canadian Sanctions and Canada’s (non-)Approach to General Permits

August 16, 2023 International Trade Bulletin 5 minute read

On July 19, 2023, Canada announced a round of sanctions against Russia, adding 39 individuals and 25 entities to the list of designated persons with whom Canadians cannot transact.[1]

This round of sanctions is notable for targeting basic consumer services by taking aim at major Russian telecom companies such as MTS and MegaFon. The sanctions also include consumer payment companies like Yandax Pay and MIR-Card. These restrictions would impact Canadians traveling in Russia, as well as Canadian companies that have commercial dealings with such telecom and financial services providers. In addition, the new sanctions further target Russia’s military-industrial complex and nuclear sector, as well as entities and individuals involved in efforts to “Russify” Ukraine’s culture. To date, Canada has sanctioned 430 Russian entities and over 1,300 individuals.

Since May 2023, Canada has also sanctioned an additional 6 Haitian individuals,[2] 14 Iranian individuals,[3] and 24 Ukrainian individuals and 17 Ukrainian entities.[4] Canada also imposed sanctions against Moldovan parties for the first time, listing 7 individuals and 1 entity.[5]

Implications of Russian Telecom Sanctions

MTS and MegaFon, as two of the largest players in Russia’s telecommunications industry, provide communication services to millions of consumers and businesses within Russia and neighbouring countries. Their designation as sanctioned entities means that persons in Canada, and Canadians outside of Canada are now prohibited from dealing in any property (which includes money, digital assets and intangible property) of MegaFon and MTS, or entering into transactions with them. Canadians with contracts (including cell phone plans) with either of these entities may now be considered to be dealing with a sanctioned entity, contrary to Canadian law. This is the case even if a Canadian person or entity is not located in Russia. Similarly, Canada’s new sanctions may impact roaming, interconnection or other agreements and Canadian companies should review existing arrangements to ensure continued compliance with Canadian law.

As discussed below, Canada has not issued general permits or exceptions that would allow Canadians living abroad to continue transacting with these companies.

General Permits: the US versus Canadian Approach

Sanctions regimes commonly provide authorities with the ability to issue general permits or licenses, which authorize certain transactions, activities, or operations that would otherwise be prohibited. These transactions may include humanitarian assistance, supporting diplomatic efforts, and enabling specific personal or business transactions that are considered essential or in the national interest.

The U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control has issued at least 34 General Licenses relating to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine since February 2022.[6] Similarly, the U.K.’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation has issued at least 29 General Licenses relating to Russia and Belarus since February 2022.[7]

Notably, Canada has never issued a General Permit under its sanctions legislation.  Individuals and entities affected by Canadian sanctions are instead required to apply to the Minister of Foreign Affairs for an individual permit that authorizes specific transactions.[8]

Canada’s newest sanctions against Russian telecom companies provide a good illustration of the distinct approach taken to issuing general permits compared to the United States. The United States added MegaFon to its list of Specially Designated Nationals (“SDN”) in April 2023. In so doing, U.S. persons are prohibited from conducting any business with SDNs. However, the United States has also issued General License 25C, which permits “all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the receipt or transmission of telecommunications involving the Russian Federation” that would otherwise be prohibited (with some exceptions).[9] The United States also issued General License No. 65, “Authorizing Transactions Related to Telecommunications and Certain Internet-based Communications Involving MegaFon PAO […]”, addressing the fact that MegaFon has a footprint outside Russia by permitting transactions involving MegaFon in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.[10]

To illustrate, a U.S. citizen living in, for instance, Uzbekistan with a cell phone plan with MegaFon may be able to continue to receive telecom services and pay her phone bill without violating U.S. sanctions laws because of General License No. 65. However, a Canadian citizen in the exact same situation would fall afoul of Canadian sanctions laws.

The policy implications of this situation are far-reaching. With a potentially high number of individual Canadians affected, this raises important questions about enforceability, and further, the legitimacy of Canada’s sanctions regime. This could potentially be resolved via a General Permit that could exempt conduct similar to that covered by the U.S. General Licenses 25C and 65C.

Expanded Restrictions on Arms and Related Material

The newest sanctions also expand Canada’s restrictions relating to arms and related materials. Canada already prohibited the importation or acquisition of any type of weapon, ammunition, military vehicle or military equipment, and spare parts of any of these goods from Russia in February 2023.[11] The recent amendments expand this prohibition to both the import and the export of any of these goods to Russia.[12] These amendments also prohibit the provision of services relating to the supply, transfer, manufacture, maintenance, or use of arms and related material.

The practical effect of this ban may be minimal since there have been zero exports to Russia of arms and ammunition since January 2021.[13] Similarly, there have been zero exports of vehicles, aircraft, vessels and associated transport equipment to Russia since January 2023.[14] However, service providers such as those providing tech support or repair services, particularly those that employ Canadians, regardless of whether they are located, should be aware of the expansion of this prohibition.

Conclusion

McMillan’s International Trade Group has published extensively on the evolving landscape of sanctions compliance and is available to assist with new developments as Canada’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues to evolve:

by Neil Campbell, William Pellerin, and Tayler Farrell

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2023

 

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Buyer’s Remorse: Asset Purchaser Liable for Pre-Closing Employment Liabilities of Vendor

In a recent British Columbia decision, an asset purchaser was held liable for the pre-closing employment-related liabilities of the vendor.

Read More
Nov 29, 2024
Featured Insight

Reducing NSF Fees: Proposed Regulations Amending the Financial Consumer Protection Framework Regulations

The Governor in Council announced a proposal to amend regulations aimed at reducing non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees.

Read More
Nov 27, 2024
Featured Insight

Federal Court of Appeal Upholds Arrears Interest on Non-Existent Tax Debts: Bank of Nova Scotia v Canada, 2024 FCA 192

The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the charging of "arrears interest" on notional income tax liabilities that are completely offset by carry-backs.

Read More
Nov 27, 2024
Featured Insight

Capital Markets Tribunal Decision Confirms Legality of Hedging Transactions Despite Public Interest Concerns

The recent ruling by the Capital Markets Tribunal underscores the inherent tension between investor protection and the goals of market efficiency and fostering.

Read More
Nov 27, 2024
Featured Insight

Here We Go Again: Employers Ordered to Pay $10,000 in Moral and Punitive Damages for Improper Termination Conduct

Three recent Ontario decisions reinforce the importance of proper termination protocols due to the ever-evolving risk of moral and punitive damage awards.

Read More
Nov 27, 2024