Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Stop the Presses: Printing of Disclosure Documents May Be a Thing of the Past

January 2020 Capital Markets Bulletin 2 minute read

Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) are seeking input on a possible mechanism to reduce regulatory burden for non-investment fund reporting issuers, by allowing electronic delivery of documents.  The framework that is under discussion is an “access equals delivery” model, pursuant to which the delivery of a document such as a prospectus is effected by the reporting issuer communicating to investors that the issuer filed the document on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) where it is publicly available.

While there are a significant number of documents with delivery requirements, such as proxy related material including take-over bid and issuer bid circulars, the CSA specified prospectuses as an area that may be prioritized when effecting an “access equals delivery” regime.  This would put the Canadian prospectus regime in line with other jurisdictions that have already adopted an “access equals delivery” model, such as the United States, the European Union, and Australia.

The CSA makes specific mention of the requirements of National Policy 11-201 Electronic Delivery of Documents (“NP 11-201”), which provides guidance for electronic delivery at present.  NP 11-201 has identified four criteria that they would consider when determining whether delivery requirements have been satisfied by electronic delivery, specifically, the investor receiving notice that the document has been or will be delivered electronically, the investor having easy access to the document, the document received being the same as the document delivered, and the issuer having evidence that the document has been delivered.

The proposal goes beyond the permissible delivery of documents electronically outlined in NP 11-201, allowing issuers to rely on SEDAR filings as mechanism of delivery.  We expect that the securities regulators, in aligning the delivery requirements with current communications trends, would speed the delivery of information to investors, reduce costs for issuers associated with printing disclosure documents, and could result in investors being driven to review SEDAR documents in general, increasing the knowledge base of the investing public.

The comment period will end on March 9, 2020.

by Cory Kent and Sasa Jarvis

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2020

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Mind the (ebike) Gap: How to Proceed with Product Recalls When There is a Regulatory Gap

While consumer interest in electric bicycles is increasing, regulatory interest in electric bicycles, or ebikes, is waning.

Read More
Sep 22, 2022
Featured Insight

Stop Snooping: Alberta Privacy Commissioner Finds Employee Snooping Results in Real Risk of Harm

An overview of a recent Alberta Privacy Commissioner breach notification decision relevant to employee snooping.

Read More
Sep 21, 2022
Featured Insight

Lessons learned from Alberta’s Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner (OIPC) 11-Year Report

An overview of Alberta's Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner 11-Year Report.

Read More
Sep 21, 2022
Featured Insight

The Case of the Missing Computers: Lessons Learned from Health Canada

A look at the takeaways from the recent audit of Health Canada's IT systems.

Read More
Sep 21, 2022
Featured Insight

Data Security – The Increasing Danger of Vishing Attacks

This bulletin provides guidance regarding voice phishing, or "vishing" attacks. As they rise in popularity, companies must take action to protect their assets.

Read More
Sep 16, 2022