Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Tapping Into New Markets – Dual Listing on the New Santiago Stock Exchange, Venture

June 2015 Securities Bulletin 2 minute read

Canadian mining exploration issuers now have a new and efficient way to access Latin American capital markets. On May 5, 2015, the Santiago Stock Exchange, Venture (“Santiago Venture Exchange“) commenced operations. This new exchange is a culmination of an initiative by the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV“) and the Santiago Stock Exchange to streamline dual listing procedures and provide TSXV-listed companies with access to public venture capital markets in both Chile and Canada. Initially, the Santiago Venture Exchange will focus on capital formation for small and medium-sized issuers in the mining sector, but may expand to other sectors in the future.

The Santiago Venture Exchange seeks to encourage the listing and financing of exploration-stage mining companies which are also compliant with the Canadian securities regulatory regime. Companies listed on the Santiago Venture Exchange must also be listed on the TSXV.

In the past two decades, Chile has grown to become one of Latin America’s largest and most prosperous economies. Dual-listed issuers will not only have access to Chilean venture capital, but also to the wider Latin American Integrated Market (MILA), a program that integrates the major stock exchanges of Chile, Mexico, Colombia, and Peru.

In response to the Santiago Venture Exchange initiative, the securities regulators in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick have adopted substantially similar blanket orders that permit Santiago Venture Exchange-listed issuers to continue to benefit from tailored venture issuer disclosure requirements, which we discussed in April 2015. Without the blanket orders, dual-listed issuers would be caught by foreign listing restrictions and would not meet the definition of “venture issuer” in National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations and other regulatory instruments. We note that TSXV-listed issuers that wish to become dual-listed, and are reporting issuers in Ontario, will have to apply to the Ontario Securities Commission for exemptive relief to retain their “venture issuer” status and continue to benefit from the new disclosure regime.

by David Andrews

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2015

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

BC Court of Appeal Improves Predictability for Employers Relying on Termination Provisions

In a recent decision, the BCCA provides the clarity sought by employers and employees alike for what is needed for an enforceable termination provision.

Read More
Jun 19, 2024
Featured Insight

Corporate Restructuring Meets Intellectual Property: Quebec Superior Court Overturns Disclaimer Notice and Issues the First Canadian Interpretation of Usage Rights under the CCAA

In the context of a restructuring, the debtor's right to resiliate a contract under s. 32 of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act is far from absolute.

Read More
Jun 19, 2024
Featured Insight

Court Upholds Shareholder-Employee Loan to Acquire a Residence

Discussion of a recent Court decision that a loan to an owner-manager to refinance his home was not a "shareholder benefit".

Read More
Jun 19, 2024
Featured Insight

Time to Get Tough! CARR Provides Guidance for CDOR Tough Legacy Contracts

CARR released guidance with respect to tough legacy contracts in Canada that don't have workable CDOR fallback language; who this applies to; why it was issued.

Read More
Jun 18, 2024
Featured Insight

Part Three of McMillan’s R. vs Greater Sudbury Webinar

As a follow up to our first two webinars back in December 2023 and February 2024 where we considered the history, details and legal implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R. v. Greater Sudbury.

Details
Thursday, June 27, 2024