Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

Testing for Marijuana: Is it Effective?

October 2018 Employment and Labour Bulletin 2 minute read

Yes and no. Marijuana impairment can be detected through visible signs and confirmed by a biological test; however, the more useful metric of functional impairment cannot be reliably measured.

Visible signs of marijuana impairment include: fatigue, impaired memory and concentration, general disorientation, spontaneous laughter, dilated pupils, bloodshot eyes, nervousness, impaired motor skills, dry mouth, coughing, nausea, and increased appetite.[1],[2] But these are common symptoms with multiple possible causes and therefore cannot be relied upon as definitive proof of marijuana impairment.

Biological testing is the only way to confirm the presence of tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC – the primary psychoactive compound  in marijuana – in an individual’s body. Saliva and blood tests are the most accurate testing options and saliva is the best at indicating recent use.[3],[4] Unfortunately, THC remains in the body anywhere from four days to two months after last use,[5] while typical impairment lasts only 2 – 24 hours.[6],[7] As such, a positive THC test does not necessarily indicate current impairment.[8]

Although reliable functional impairment testing is not yet possible, employers should develop a clear marijuana impairment policy based on fitness-to-work.[9] This is consistent with workers’ legal obligations to advise their employer if their ability to safely perform work is impaired.[10]

Employers should also consider impairment training for supervisory staff, and how to satisfy the need to have reasonable grounds if considering testing. It will be important for supervisors to not rely on stereotypes or personal belief if determining an employee is impaired.

by Natalie Cuthill

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2018

[1] Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, “Workplace Strategies: Risk of Impairment from Cannabis – 2nd edition,” January/February 2018, ISBN: 978-0-660-24755-7 [Workplace Strategies].
[2] Wayne K. Jeffery, BSc, MSc (Pharm), “Marijuana Interpretation: Biological Testing or Psychophysical Testing?” presentation slides [Marijuana Interpretation].
[3] Workplace Strategies, supra note 1.
[4] Marijuana Interpretation, supra note 2.
[5] Workplace Strategies, supra note 1.
[6] Workplace Strategies, supra note 1.
[7] Marijuana Interpretation, supra note 2.
[8] Canadian Human Rights Commission, “Impaired at Work: a guide to accommodating substance dependence – Frequently Asked Questions.” Minister of Public Works and Government Services 2017. Retrieved from: http://www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca/eng/content/ impaired-work-guide-accommodating-substance-dependence
[9] WorkSafeBC, “Workplace impairment: A primer on preparing for cannabis legalization,” May 2018.
[10] See, for example, sections 4.19 and 4.20 of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, BC Reg. 143/2017.

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Privacy, Technology and Cybersecurity Issues in Tech Transactions

Full evaluation of a target's privacy, technology and cybersecurity compliance in due diligence is critical for transactions involving technology companies.

Read More
Dec 6, 2022
Featured Insight

TSX Considering Adoption of Pricing Guidelines for Prospectus Offerings

TSX Considering Adoption of Pricing Guidelines for Prospectus Offerings

Read More
Dec 6, 2022
Featured Insight

Ottawa LRT and the Future of P3s: Public (interest), Private (collaboration) & (meaningful) Partnerships

A summary of the Commission’s key recommendations arising from the Ottawa Light Rail Transit Public Inquiry regarding the public-private-partnership (P3) model.

Read More
Dec 5, 2022
Featured Insight

Arbitration Clauses Should be Respected, Most of the Time: Supreme Court of Canada Shifts Focus Away From Single Proceeding Model for Insolvencies in Rendering Arbitration Clause Inoperative

The SCC has provided a framework on when arbitration clauses should be rendered inoperative in order to promote efficiency in an insolvency proceeding.

Read More
Dec 5, 2022
Featured Insight

Corporate Counsel Webinar | Beyond the Basics: Tools and Strategies to Create a More Inclusive Legal Work Environment

Join our guest speaker, Jodie Glean-Mitchell, Executive Director of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, from the University of Toronto as we invite participants to dive deeper into the intricacies of intersectional identities and experiences with (micro)aggressions and their implications for the legal work environment.

Details
Tuesday, December 13, 2022