Digital Brain
digital brain
digital brain

The Growing Interdependency of the World Economy: How Customary International Law Plays a Role

Events 2 minutes read

February 23, 2021
5:00 pm (PST)

Please join us to explore the origins of customary international law (CIL) as part of the law of Canada, the circumstances under which a nation can exert jurisdiction outside its territory and the impact of business and citizens of purported extraterritorial jurisdiction.

The past decade has witnessed an increase in attempts to regulate overseas conduct. In Nevsun, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada re-affirmed that CIL is also the law of Canada and it must be treated with the same respect as any other law.  CIL recognizes that there are limitations on jurisdiction over extraterritorial conduct. Under CIL, countries are limited in their assertion of jurisdiction to those cases where there can be established a substantial and genuine connection to the home jurisdiction. This limit is derived from duties of each country to respect the sovereignty of other countries.

While commentators have largely focused on the significance of Nevsun for transnational human rights litigation, it is worth contemplating the wider and deeper ripples in the legal landscape that this decision may yet produce. How might customary international law come into play when environmental accidents occur outside Canadian territory? What are the evolving expectations and responsibilities with respect to climate change in customary international law? Why might it matter that many UNDRIP provisions constitute customary international law? And what are the new demands on legal counsel tasked with advising clients in fast-moving transnational legal contexts where public and private international law are increasingly intermingled?

Webinar panelists will provide insights on:

  • The practical implications of CIL on Canadian citizens and businesses
  • How CIL can restrict the application of extraterritorial laws
  • How Canadian businesses and individuals could be subject to torts based on international human rights violations and environmental incidents in Canadian courts

Panelists:

Natasha Affolder 
Professor
Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia

Joanna Harrington
Professor and Eldon Foote Chair in Law
Faculty of Law, University of Alberta

Ted L McDorman
Professor
Faculty of Law, University of Victoria

Asad Kiyani
Assistant Professor
Faculty of Law, University of Victoria

Moderators:

Stephen Wortley
Partner, Capital Markets & Securities
McMillan LLP

Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2021
Time: 5:00 pm (PST)
Access: Viewing instructions will be sent via email to those who RSVP to attend.
RSVP 

For more information, please contact: events@mcmillan.ca

Related Publications (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Supreme Court of Canada Confirms: CCAA Super-Priority Charges Rank Ahead of CRA’s Deemed Trusts

Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. provided much needed clarity regarding the order of priority for unremitted source deductions in restructuring proceedings.

Read More
Sep 17, 2021
Featured Insight

McMillan’s ESG Strategy Sessions

The COVID-19 pandemic and increased concerns over environmental and social issues, such as climate change and systemic racism, have prompted conversations throughout global capital markets.

Details
Wednesday, October 6, 2021
Featured Insight

Divisional Court confirms Environmental Significance of Ministerial Zoning Orders and Importance of Consultation under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993

Review of Divisional Court decision: Ontario’s compliance with Environmental Bill of Rights in passing Bill 197, particularly re: Ministerial Zoning Orders

Read More
Sep 13, 2021
Featured Insight

Federal Government Launches Consultations on Remedies Against Low-Priced Imports

A review of the stakeholder engagement process for proposed amendments to the Special Import Measures Act and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act

Read More
Sep 13, 2021
Featured Insight

Mandatory Mask Policy Does Not Breach Human Rights Act

Alberta's Human Rights Commission has dismissed a complaint alleging that Costco discriminated against a customer who refused to wear a mask or face shield.

Read More
Sep 9, 2021