


The Minister of Transport Confirms Rail Legislation Coming in Spring Session
The Minister of Transport Confirms Rail Legislation Coming in Spring Session
The Minister of Transport, Marc Garneau, has addressed a letter to the Chair of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities (“SCOTIC”) that confirms the government is on track to table remedial rail legislation in the House of Commons during the spring legislative session. The letter follows the Government of Canada’s extension of the Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act and the report of SCOTIC entitled Certain Provisions of the Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act, which was tabled in the House of Commons on December 14, 2016.
As summarized in our previous bulletin, among other things, the Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act, enacted by the previous Conservative government, had empowered the Canadian Transportation Agency to extend regulated interswitching rates in the Prairie provinces from 30 kilometres to 160 kilometres. That Act also empowered the Agency to require a federal railway company to compensate any person for expenses suffered as a result of that railway company’s failure to fulfill its service obligations to that person and make regulations specifying what constitutes “operational terms” for the purposes of rail service level arbitrations.
The April 12, 2017 letter from Minister Garneau indicates that the legislation will address:
- the future of the 160 kilometre extended rail interswitching limit;
- the requirement that Canadian National Railway and Canadian Pacific Railway move minimum volumes of grain;[1]
- clarifying the meaning of “adequate and suitable” service for common carriers such as CN and CP;
- financial penalties in the context of rail service level agreements;
- the future of CN’s and CP’s Maximum Revenue Entitlement from the carriage of grain;
- rail shippers’ recourse to dispute resolution processes; and
- access to federal railway market data.
The letter indicates the legislation will also include other complementary measures for strengthening the rail policy framework. It remains to be seen whether the legislation is passed before the end of the spring legislative session.
by Ryan Gallagher, Lucia Stuhldreier, François Tougas
[1] Canada Transportation Act, s. 116.2.
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)
Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.
A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.
On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.
Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award
Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.
Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections
Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.
Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”
Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.