


Update: Federal Pooled Registered Pension Plan Legislation Amended to Recognize Ontario Legislation
Update: Federal Pooled Registered Pension Plan Legislation Amended to Recognize Ontario Legislation
We published a bulletin last November advising that Ontario’s Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act, 2015 and its Regulations had come into force.
The new legislation establishes the Pooled Registered Pension Plan (“PRPP”) as another tool for Ontario workers – both employees and self-employed – to save for retirement. As a voluntary and relatively low-cost scheme, PRPPs may also be a helpful option for small and medium-sized businesses, for whom the operation of a full pension plan may be too onerous.
In passing its own PRPP legislation, Ontario signalled its intention to join the Multilateral Agreement Respecting Pooled Registered Pension Plans and Voluntary Savings Plans (“Multilateral Agreement”), a tool designed to ensure consistency in PRPP legislation (and Voluntary Savings Plan legislation in Quebec) across the country. Doing so is logical given that the Multilateral Agreement’s members’ PRPP legislation largely incorporates the federal PRPP Act and Regulations by reference. The Multilateral Agreement’s members include British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Quebec, Nova Scotia and, now, Ontario.
To formally enter the Multilateral Agreement, Ontario required the federal government to amend the federal PRPP Regulations to designate Ontario and the Ontario Superintendent of Financial Service (OSFI) as a having regulatory PRPP authority within Ontario jurisdiction. It formally did so in December, 2016.
As reflected in the federal government’s Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement, the Multilateral Agreement’s members hope that it will enable further streamlining of PRPP supervision, thereby better enabling the creation of larger, multi-jurisdictional PRPPs.
by Kyle Lambert
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)View More
The Planning Act and the Duty to Consult First Nations Communities after Galibier Materials Inc. v. Springwater (Township)
How extensive is the duty to consult with First Nations communities under the Planning Act
Manitoba’s New Accessibility Regulation: What Franchisors Need to Know
In this update we explore some considerations for franchisors that may arise through Manitoba's new accessible information regulation.
All Things Tariffs: A Comprehensive Overview of Where We Stand Today
In response to US tariffs, Canada has imposed retaliatory tariffs on a wide variety of products. Recent developments now include opportunities for remission.
Who Owns a Thought? Navigating Legal Issues in Neurotech
In this bulletin, we explore some legal considerations that could arise as consumer-oriented neurotechnology becomes increasingly accessible.
Return-to-Office Mandate Triggers Constructive Dismissal (… This Time)
An employer’s return-to-office mandate constituted grounds for constructive dismissal of an employee with a longstanding work-from-home arrangement.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.