Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Venture Issuers are Reminded to Consider Recent Regulatory Developments

May 2016 Securities Bulletin 3 minute read

The past year has seen a number of regulatory developments impacting venture issuers. [1] Recognizing the challenges faced by smaller public issuers, securities regulatory authorities have introduced new measures to simplify disclosure requirements and regulatory compliance while also introducing new prospectus exemptions to assist with capital raising.

For venture issuers with financial years ending December 31, the upcoming 2016 proxy season and first quarter financial filings will mark the first time that they encounter some of these simplified disclosure options now available to them. We hope that this bulletin will serve as a timely reminder of the new streamlined disclosure requirements and capital raising options which are of interest to venture issuers.

Quarterly Highlights

For financial years beginning on or after July 1, 2015, venture issuers now have the option to file a condensed “quarterly highlights” disclosure document in place of a full-fledged MD&A. For venture issuers with financial years ending December 31, this option is available for their first quarter ended March 31, 2016.

For more information see our bulletin: A Tailored Fit: Streamlined Disclosure Rules to Suit Venture Issuers

New Form of Executive Compensation

For the 2016 proxy season, venture issuers may now elect to use the new streamlined executive compensation disclosure form (Form 51-102F6V), which was made available to venture issuers from July 1, 2015. In addition, venture issuers now have 180 days from their financial year-end to file executive compensation disclosure.

For more information see our bulletin: A Tailored Fit: Streamlined Disclosure Rules to Suit Venture Issuers

New Form of Report of Exempt Distribution

In an effort to harmonize exempt distribution reporting across Canada and to lessen the burden a dual reporting regime imposes on issuers, the Canadian Securities Administrators has published a new form for reports of exempt distribution. The new form will merge Form 45-106F1 (used in all provinces except British Columbia) and Form 45-106F6 (used in British Columbia) and can be filed in all jurisdictions in Canada; however, it will require disclosure of additional information not required in the current forms.

For more information see our bulletin: 2 Become 1: CSA Proposes Creation of Single Exempt Distribution Reporting Regime

New Prospectus Exemptions

The past year has seen the introduction of a number of new prospectus exemptions intended to facilitate capital raising in Canada, many of which are aimed at smaller public companies facing a challenging financing environment. Some of the key developments in this area, which may be of interest to venture issuers, are summarized below.

Investment Dealer Exemption

A new investment dealer prospectus exemption, available in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and New Brunswick, permits issuers with shares listed on the TSX Venture Exchange to distribute securities to investors that have obtained advice about the investment’s suitability from an investment dealer, subject to complying with certain disclosure and other requirements of the exemption.

For more information see our bulletin: New Investment Dealer Prospectus Exemption Adopted

Existing Security Holder Exemption

In 2015, Ontario joined the majority of Canadian jurisdictions in adopting a prospectus exemption that permits issuers to distribute securities to existing security holders. To rely on the exemption, a number of conditions must be met, including that the issuer’s shares must be listed on a designated stock exchange, the issuer must make the offering available to all existing security holders, the offering may not increase the number of outstanding listed securities of the issuer by more than 100% and the offering must be disclosed in a press release.

For more information see our bulletin: OSC Adopts Existing Security Holder Prospectus Exemption

Changes to the Rights Offering Exemption

Canadian Securities Regulators have introduced changes to the rights offering prospectus exemption which are intended to streamline the requirements for use of the exemption and make it a more useful option for issuers.

For more information see our bulletin: Rights (offering) on the Money: CSA Announces Changes to Rights Offering Prospectus Exemptions

Harmonization of Offering Memorandum and Family, Friends and Business Associates Exemptions

Ontario has introduced an offering memorandum prospectus exemption as well as a family, friends and business associates prospectus exemption which permits prospectus exempt distributions to directors, officers, control persons and founders of issuers as well as their family members, close personal friends and close business associates. These amendments harmonize the exemptions with other Canadian jurisdictions, which have long since had these exemptions available.

For more information see our bulletin: OSC Introduces Four Proposed Prospectus Exemptions in Ontario

***

Venture issuers considering implementing the new measures to simplify disclosure requirements and/or regulatory compliance related to periodic reporting should speak with legal counsel to see if these new measures are available. Likewise, if an issuer is seeking to rely on the new capital raising prospectus exemptions, the issuer should speak with legal counsel to see if the new prospectus exemptions are available to the issuer.

by James Munro, Mark Neighbor and Bill Olaguera, Articled Student

1. In general, a “venture issuer” is a reporting issuer that does not have securities listed or quoted on the Toronto Stock Exchange, Aequitas NEO Exchange Inc., a U.S. marketplace or a marketplace outside of Canada and the U.S., other than certain exempted exchanges.

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2016

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

British Columbia’s New Money Judgment Enforcement Act: An Overview

An overview of the new British Columbia Money Judgment Enforcement Act.

Read More
Oct 11, 2024
Featured Insight

Navigating the Grey (Part 2): Deciphering the Meaning of the term “Making” under Section 42 of the Canadian Patent Act.

The Federal Court of Canada provides further clarity on the meaning of the term "making" under Section 42 of the Patent Act.

Read More
Oct 10, 2024
Featured Insight

McMillan’s Annual Privacy, Data Protection and Cybersecurity Client Seminar

This program will provide an overview of recent significant decisions and regulatory guidance, along with discussions about the privacy implications of AI and how deceptive design patterns could be impacting your organization’s legal compliance.

Details
Thursday, October 24, 2024
Featured Insight

Risking More than Just a Bad Review: Employer Found Vicariously Liable for Acts of Employee in Providing Services

Are employers focused on claims of harassment or discrimination by employees against members of the public who are receiving services from the employer?

Read More
Oct 9, 2024