Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Who Owns Copyright in a Registered Plan of Survey – A Brief Update

June 2018 Intellectual Property Bulletin 2 minute read

In May 2018 we reported on the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Keatley Surveying Ltd.[1] which held that a land surveyor did not own the copyright in a plan of survey presented for registration or deposit in Ontario’s land registry system.  In our earlier bulletin we noted that the surveyor had filed an application for permission (leave) to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.  Teranet filed an application for leave to cross-appeal.

On June 21, 2018 the Supreme Court of Canada granted the surveyor leave to appeal the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.  It also granted leave to Teranet to cross-appeal.[2]

The Supreme Court of Canada does not give reasons when granting leave to appeal, so it is difficult to say very much about the case except that the Court will look at the issues raised by the parties.

The surveyor sought leave on the proper interpretation of s. 12 of the Copyright Act.  It contends that the section should be given a narrow meaning, and that it cannot be read to mean that if a government body chooses to publish a work whose copyright is held by another party the government becomes the owner of the copyright.

In order to understand Teranet’s cross-appeal it is necessary to recall that Keatley was a certified class action, and the decision under appeal arose from motions for summary judgment by the parties on the common issues following the certification.  The ownership of the copyright had been certified as common issue 2.  There were other common issues that we not dealt with in the Court of Appeal, as Teranet’s success on common issue 2 meant that those other issues did not need to be addressed.  In the Supreme Court of Canada Teranet sought leave to cross-appeal and have the other common issues referred back to the Ontario Court of Appeal for determination in the event that Keatley succeeds in its appeal.

The Attorney General of Ontario made very brief submissions in a letter to the effect that Keatley’s application for leave did not raise an issue of national or public importance.

by Peter Wells

[1] Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc. 2017 ONCA 748; 139 OR (3d) 340
[2] Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc. SCC Case 37863

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2018

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

BC Human Rights Tribunal Questions Enforceability of Release

This bulletin addresses the enforceability of releases signed following a termination and reiterates best practices for obtaining an enforceable release.

Read More
May 29, 2024
Featured Insight

Proposed Changes to Employment in Ontario: Working for Workers Five Act, 2024

This bulletin discuss new employer obligations proposed in Bill 190, the Working for Workers Five Act, 2024.

Read More
May 28, 2024
Featured Insight

Investor Relations Activities Require Clear and Conspicuous Disclosure

BC Notice 51-703 emphasizes that investor relations activities must be “clearly and conspicuously” disclosed pursuant to Section 52(2) of the Securities Act.

Read More
May 22, 2024
Featured Insight

Unpacking Ontario’s Proposed Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

Unpacking Ontario's Bill 194: Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024. Key changes & compliance strategies detailed.

Read More
May 17, 2024
Featured Insight

Navigating International Student Worker Restrictions: Post-Expiry Guidelines for Employers

On April 30, 2024, Canada’s temporary waiver allowing international students to exceed 20 hours of work per week expired.

Read More
May 14, 2024