Motion Media wall concept smart TV
Motion Media wall concept smart TV
Motion Media wall concept smart TV

Robin Junger told BIVnews that Senator Black’s bill is unnecessarily heavy-handed

News Sep 11, 2018

When the Federal Court of Appeal quashed the approval of the $7.4 billion Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, it left the door open for a potentially speedy remedy.

But it may have also opened other doors that could add yet more hurdles, delays and controversy.

Because the appeal court ruled a National Energy Board (NEB) environmental review was flawed, it may have cleared the way for the B.C. government to require that a provincial environmental review be redone as well, said BC Green Party Leader Andrew Weaver.

Ottawa has at least two options if it wants the expansion back on track. It can obey the appeal court, which means going back to the drawing board to address the two flaws identified in the ruling. Or it can appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court of Canada, as Alberta Premier Rachel Notley has demanded.

Senator Doug Black thinks the Trudeau government should exercise both options and add a third by enacting Bill S-245, the Trans Mountain Pipeline Project Act, which is languishing on the order paper in the House of Commons.

Black’s bill would use a section of the Constitution Act to declare the pipeline expansion “for the general advantage of Canada.” It would effectively expropriate the pipeline corridor, allowing the federal government to ignore provincial and municipal laws.

Robin Junger, an expert in Aboriginal and environmental law for McMillan LLP, said Black’s bill is unnecessarily heavy-handed.

“There are a range of legislative options, and one doesn’t have to go that far,” he said.

The government could amend the way the NEB legislation applies to the project, for example, or set out a new framework for Aboriginal engagement and accommodation.

“A legislative response needn’t necessarily be a major hammer,” Junger said.

Even if Ottawa can satisfy the appeal court and again approve the expansion, it likely won’t put an end to the legal challenges, he said.

To read the full article in BIV click here.


Related News

News

McMillan Lawyers Achieve 33 Rankings in the 2022 Who’s Who Legal: Canada Guide

We are delighted that Who’s Who Legal: Canada has recognized 31 lawyers from across McMillan as top business law advisors in their fields.

News Nov 29, 2022
Read More
News

McMillan Lawyers Achieve 31 Rankings in the 2022 Who’s Who Legal: Global Guide

We are delighted that Who’s Who Legal: Global has recognized 28 lawyers from across McMillan as top business law advisors in their fields.

News Nov 29, 2022
Read More
News

Nine McMillan Lawyers Recognized in Lexpert’s 2022 Special Edition on Canada’s Leading Litigation Lawyers

We are pleased to announce that nine of the firm’s lawyers are recognized for exceptional expertise in the 2022 Lexpert Special Edition on Canada’s Leading Litigation Lawyers.

News Nov 23, 2022
Read More